On Husserl’s Remark that “[s]elbst eine sich als apodiktisch ausgebende Evidenz kann sich als Täuschung enthüllen …” : Does the Phenomenological Method Yield Any Epistemic Infallibility? [Book Review]
Husserl Studies 25 (1):15-43 (2009)
AbstractAddressing Walter Hopp’s original application of the distinction between agent-fallibility and method-fallibility to phenomenological inquiry concerning epistemic justification, I question whether these are the only two forms of fallibility that are useful or whether there are not also others that are needed. In doing so, I draw my inspiration from Husserl, who in the beginnings of his phenomenological investigations struggled with the distinction between noetic and noematic analyses. For example, in the Preface to the Second Edition of the Logical Investigations he criticizes the First Investigation as having been “one-sidedly” noetically directed and as having thus neglected the noematic aspects of meaning (XVIII 13–14). Also, in an addendum to the Fifth Investigation he notes that in the transition from the First Edition to the Second he has learned to broaden the concept of “phenomenological content” to include not only the “real” ( reell ) contents (noetic, subjective) of consciousness but also the “intentional” (noematic, objective) (XIX/1 411). The fact that, in gradually moving from consciousness (noesis) to what consciousness is of (noema), Husserl struggled with this distinction is an indication of the immensity of the perplexing problems and potential solutions that Hopp has led the phenomenology of knowledge into by introducing his useful notions of agent-fallibility and method-fallibility. Like Husserl, he has focused mainly and mostly on the noetic issues; like Husserl as well, I will try to move step by step from the noetic area into the noematic. I conclude that Hopp’s approach has the potential to become seminal.
Similar books and articles
Epistemic justification and Husserl's phenomenology of reason in ideas I.Carlos Sanchez - 2010 - In Pol Vandevelde & Sebastian Luft (eds.), Epistemology, Archaeology, Ethics: Current Investigations of Husserl's Corpus. Continuum.
An addendum to the exchange with Walter hopp on phenomenology and fallibility.George Heffernan - 2009 - Husserl Studies 25 (1):51-55.
Noema and thinkability: An essay on Husserl's theory of intentionality.Łukasz Kosowski - 2010 - Ontos.
Theory of intentionality.Ronald McIntyre & David Woodruff Smith - 1989 - In William R. McKenna & J. N. Mohanty (eds.), Husserl's Phenomenology: A Textbook. University Press of America.
Fred Kersten: 'Phenomenological Method: Theory and Practice'. [REVIEW]John J. Drummond, James Hart & J. Claude Evans - 1992 - Husserl Studies 9 (3):219-226.
Husserl's Phenomenological Method in Management.Robert Keith Shaw - 2010 - In Proceedings of the ANZAM conference, Adelaide, Australia. Australia and New Zealand Academy of Management.
Subjectivity and Lifeworld in Transcendental Phenomenology.Sebastian Luft - 2011 - Northwestern University Press.
Why did Husserl not become the Galileo of the science of consciousness?Andrzej Klawiter - 2004 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82 (1):253-271.
Husserl, phenomenology, and foundationalism.Walter Hopp - 2008 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (2):194 – 216.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
On the nature and systematic role of evidence: Husserl as a proponent of mentalist evidentialism?Philipp Berghofer - 2019 - European Journal of Philosophy 27 (1):98-117.
Phenomenology and Experimental Psychology: On the Prospects and Limitations of Experimental Research for a Phenomenological Epistemology.Philipp Berghofer - 2020 - Journal of Transcendental Philosophy 1 (1):85-108.
PHENOMENOLOGICAL SCIENTIFIC REALISM Einstein, Husserl, and Neelamkavil.Ruth Castillo - forthcoming - Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science.
From Adequacy to Apodicticity. Development of the Notion of Reflection in Husserl’s Phenomenology.Wenjing Cai - 2013 - Husserl Studies 29 (1):13-27.
References found in this work
Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge.Karl Raimund Popper - 1962 - London, England: Routledge.