Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (1):59-65 (2011)

Authors
Bert Heinrichs
Universität Bonn
Abstract
It has become evident that neuroimaging raises new normative questions that cannot be addressed adequately within the (in this regard unspecific) frameworks of existing research ethics. Questions that are especially troubling are, among others, provoked by incidental findings. Two questions are particularly intricate in view of incidental findings: (1) How can the research subject’s right not to know be guaranteed? And (2) should a diagnostic check of scans by a neuroradiologist become an obligatory part of neuroscientific research protocols? The present paper examines these question against the background of two recent recommendations. The differentiation between difference position and similarity position serves as an analytic tool to further investigate the issue and to develop a distinct proposal for answering the questions
Keywords Incidental findings  Neuroimaging  Right to know/not to know  Diagnostic misconception  Similarity/difference position  Neuroethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9268-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,784
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Neuroscience and the Teaching of Mathematics.Kerry Lee & Swee Fong Ng - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (1):81-86.
Research Malpractice and the Issue of Incidental Findings.Alan C. Milstein - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):356-360.
Genomic Research and Incidental Findings.Brian Van Ness - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):292-297.
Neuroethics and Neuroimaging: Moving Toward Transparency.Joseph J. Fins - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (9):46 – 52.
Incidental Findings in Pediatric Research.Benjamin S. Wilfond & Katherine J. Carpenter - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):332-340.
Incidental Findings in Genetics Research Using Archived DNA.Ellen Wright Clayton - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):286-291.
Incidental Findings in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Brain Research.Charles A. Nelson - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):315-319.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-12-18

Total views
75 ( #147,218 of 2,463,136 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #299,108 of 2,463,136 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes