Cognitive and Social Structure of the Elite Collaboration Network of Astrophysics: A Case Study on Shifting Network Structures [Book Review]
Minerva 49 (4):461-488 (2011)
Scientific collaboration can only be understood along the epistemic and cognitive grounding of scientific disciplines. New scientific discoveries in astrophysics led to a major restructuring of the elite network of astrophysics. To study the interplay of the epistemic grounding and the social network structure of a discipline, a mixed-methods approach is necessary. It combines scientometrics, quantitative network analysis and visualization tools with a qualitative network analysis approach. The centre of the international collaboration network of astrophysics is demarcated by identifying the 225 most productive astrophysicists. For the years 1998–1999 and 2001–2006 four co-authorship networks are constructed comprehending each a two year period. A visualization of the longitudinal network data gives first hints on the structural development of the network. The network of 2005–2006 is analyzed in depth. Based on cohesion analysis tools for network analysis, two main cores and three smaller ones are identified. Scientists in each core and additionally in structurally interesting positions are identified and 17 qualitative expert interviews are conducted with them. The visualization of the network of 2005–2006 is used in the interviews as a stimulus for the interviewees. An analysis of the three most often used keywords of the 225 astrophysicists is included and combined with the other data. The triangulation of these approaches shows that major epistemic changes in astrophysics, e.g. the discovery of the accelerating expansion of the universe, together with technical and organizational innovations, leads to a restructuring of the network of the discipline. The importance of a combination of qualitative and quantitative network analysis tools for the understanding of the interplay of cognitive and social structure in the sociology of science is substantiated
|Keywords||Scientific networks Cognitive structure Co-authorship network Astrophysics Scientific collaboration Elite network Social network analysis Epistemic culture Scientific disciplines Dark energy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences.Richard Whitley - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
The Copernican Revolution: Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1957 - Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Analysis of a Distribution of Point Events Using the Network-Based Quadrat Method.Shino Shiode - 2008 - Geographical Analysis 40 (4):380-400.
Mapping Communication and Collaboration in Heterogeneous Research Networks.Gaston Heimeriks, Marianne Hörlesberger & Peter Van den Besselaar - unknown
A Network Approach for Distinguishing Ethical Issues in Research and Development.Sjoerd D. Zwart, Ibo van de Poel, Harald van Mil & Michiel Brumsen - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (4):663-684.
Disciplinary Networks and Bounding: Scientific Communication Between Science and Technology Studies and the History of Science. [REVIEW]Frédéric Vandermoere & Raf Vanderstraeten - 2012 - Minerva 50 (4):451-470.
Signatures in Networks Generated From Agent-Based Social Simulation Models.Ruth Meyer & Bruce Edmonds - unknown
The Emergence of the Social Brain Network: Evidence From Typical and Atypical Development.Mark H. Johnson & Leslie A. Tucker - unknown
The Absolute Network Theory of Language and Traditional Epistemology: On the Philosophical Foundations of Paul Churchland's Scientific Realism.Herman Philipse - 1990 - Inquiry 33 (2):127 – 178.
Interactions in Economic Models: Statistical Mechanics and Networks. [REVIEW]Müge Ozman - 2005 - Mind and Society 4 (2):223-238.
A Network Approach to the French System of Legal Codes—Part I: Analysis of a Dense Network. [REVIEW]Romain Boulet, Pierre Mazzega & Danièle Bourcier - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (4):333-355.
Using Extra Output Learning to Insert a Symbolic Theory Into a Connectionist Network.M. R. W. Dawson, D. A. Medler, D. B. McCaughan, L. Willson & M. Carbonaro - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (2):171-201.
Connectionist Hysteria: Reducing a Freudian Case Study to a Network Model.Dan Lloyd - 1994 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 1 (2):69-88.
An Extraterrestrial Perspective on Conceptual Development.Christopher Gauker - 1993 - Mind and Language 8 (1):105-30.
Moral Learning in an Integrated Social and Healthcare Service Network.Merel Visse, Guy A. M. Widdershoven & Tineke A. Abma - 2012 - Health Care Analysis 20 (3):281-296.
Added to index2011-11-24
Total downloads16 ( #294,992 of 2,158,467 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #354,697 of 2,158,467 )
How can I increase my downloads?