Hypotheses and Conventions in Poincaré

In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science. De Gruyter. pp. 169-192 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Poincaré’s Classification of Hypotheses and Their Role in Natural Science.María de Paz - 2015 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):369-382.
Henri Poincare and Bruno de finetti: Conventions and scientific reasoning.S. B. - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28 (4):657-679.
Henri Poincaré and bruno de finetti: Conventions and scientific reasoning.B. S. Gower - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28 (4):657-679.
From positivism to conventionalism: Comte, Renouvier, and Poincaré.Warren Schmaus - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 80:102-109.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
4 (#1,595,600)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Poincaré’s Classification of Hypotheses and Their Role in Natural Science.María de Paz - 2015 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):369-382.
The Methods Behind Poincaré’s Conventions: Structuralism and Hypothetical-Deductivism.María de Paz - 2023 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 54 (1):169-188.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references