Wittgenstein-Studien 13 (1):185-190 (2022)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
References to God. Some Remarks by Wittgenstein on Religion in the Years 1949 – 51. After a brief overview of Wittgenstein's stock of remarks on the subject of religion from 1949 – 1951, this article will focus on two particular points: supposedly nonsensical conceptions of God, for instance in the context of proofs of God, definitions of the term ”God” by hinting at something. Connections between and both systematically and exegetically within the framework of Wittgenstein's remarks are made.Ich danke Anja Weiberg für sehr hilfreiche Kommentare.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1515/witt-2022-0013 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Book Review: Juliet Floyd and Felix Mühlhölzer, Wittgenstein’s Annotations to Hardy’s Course of Pure Mathematics: An Investigation of Wittgenstein’s Non-Extensionalist Understanding of the Real Numbers. [REVIEW]Kim Solin - 2021 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 10.
Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Mathematics: Felix Mühlhölzer in Conversation with Sebastian Grève.Felix Mühlhölzer - 2014 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 3 (2):151-180.
Wittgenstein and the Regular Heptagon.Felix Mühlhölzer - 2001 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 62 (1):215-247.
On Being Surprised: Wittgenstein on Aspect-Perception, Logic, and Mathematics.Juliet Floyd - 2010 - In William Day & Víctor J. Krebs (eds.), Seeing Wittgenstein Anew. Cambridge University Press.
Wittgenstein and Turing.Juliet Floyd - 2019 - In Gabriele M. Mras, Paul Weingartner & Bernhard Ritter (eds.), Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics: Proceedings of the 41st International Ludwig Wittgenstein Symposium. De Gruyter. pp. 263-296.
Depth and Clarity * Felix Muhlholzer. Braucht Die Mathematik Eine Grundlegung? Eine Kommentar des Teils III von Wittgensteins Bemerkungen Uber Die Grundlagen der Mathematik [Does Mathematics Need a Foundation? A Commentary on Part III of Wittgenstein's Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics]. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann, 2010. ISBN: 978-3-465-03667-8. Pp. Xiv + 602. [REVIEW]Juliet Floyd - 2015 - Philosophia Mathematica 23 (2):255-276.
On Saying What You Really Want to Say: Wittgenstein, Gödel and the Trisection of the Angle.Juliet Floyd - 1995 - In Jaakko Hintikka (ed.), From Dedekind to Gödel: The Foundations of Mathematics in the Early Twentieth Century, Synthese Library Vol. 251 (Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 373-426.
Aspects of the Real Numbers: Putnam, Wittgenstein, and Nonextensionalism.Juliet Floyd - 2020 - The Monist 103 (4):427-441.
Reductions of Mathematics: Foundation or Horizon?Felix Mühlhölzer - 2019 - In Gabriele M. Mras, Paul Weingartner & Bernhard Ritter (eds.), Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics: Proceedings of the 41st International Ludwig Wittgenstein Symposium. De Gruyter. pp. 327-342.
Wittgensteins Diagonal-Argument: Eine Variation auf Cantor und Turing.Juliet Floyd - forthcoming - In Joachim Bromand & Bastian Reichert (eds.), Wittgenstein und die Philosophie der Mathematik. Münster: Mentis Verlag. pp. 167-197.
Misunderstanding Gödel: New Arguments About Wittgenstein and New Remarks by Wittgenstein.Victor Rodych - 2003 - Dialectica 57 (3):279–313.
Misunderstanding Gödel: New Arguments About Wittgenstein and New Remarks by Wittgenstein.Victor Rodych - 2003 - Dialectica 57 (3):279-313.
Wittgenstein as His Own Worst Enemy: The Case of Gödel's Theorem.Mark Steiner - 2001 - Philosophia Mathematica 9 (3):257-279.
Wittgenstein on 2, 2, 2 ...: The Opening of Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics.Juliet Floyd - 1991 - Synthese 87 (1):143 - 180.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2022-03-15
Total views
1 ( #1,545,393 of 2,506,286 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,286 )
2022-03-15
Total views
1 ( #1,545,393 of 2,506,286 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,286 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.