Southwest Philosophy Review 25 (1):127-134 (2009)

Authors
Deborah Heikes
University of Alabama, Huntsville
Abstract
Feminist philosophy is highly critical of Cartesian, and more broadly Enlightenment, conceptions of rationality. However, feminist philosophers typically fail to address contemporary theories of rationality and to consider how more current thoeories address feminist concerns. I argue that, contrary to their protestations, feminists are “obsessing over an outdated conception of reason” and that even the most suspect of “malestream” philosophers express an understanding of rationality that is closer to feminist concerns than Cartesian ones. I begin by briefly examining key features of Cartesian rationality and discuss how these features are largely rejected by contemporary philosophy and cognitve science. I then discuss how the philosophical accounts of Robert Nozick and Robert Audi refelect this rejection of Cartesian rationality. Finally, I discuss how the views of Nozick and Audi are in line with many feminist concerns, and I argue that feminists need to take seriously some theory of rationality.
Keywords feminism  rationality  Cartesianism
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0897-2346
DOI 10.5840/swphilreview200925113
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Being Reasonable.Deborah K. Heikes - 2012 - Southwest Philosophy Review 28 (1):187-195.
Reasonable Women in the Law.Susan Dimock - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (2):153-175.
Reasonable Doubts About Reasonable Nonbelief.Douglas V. Henry - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (3):276-289.
Rape and the Reasonable Man.C. D. & K. Haely - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (2):113-139.
Rape and the Reasonable Man.Donald C. Hubin & Karen Haely - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (2):113-139.
Reasons and Religious Belief.David Michael Levin - 1969 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 12 (1-4):371 – 393.
Reasonable Care: Equality as Objectivity. [REVIEW]Avihay Dorfman - 2012 - Law and Philosophy 31 (4):369-407.
Reasonable Sanctions for Reasonable Doctrines.David Meeler - 2000 - Journal of Social Philosophy 31 (2):153–159.
Trust and Diachronic Agency.Edward S. Hinchman - 2003 - Noûs 37 (1):25–51.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total views
147 ( #71,265 of 2,446,439 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #310,179 of 2,446,439 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes