Philosophy East and West 50 (2):179-207 (2000)
Ten years after Buber published his "I and Thou," the Japanese philosopher Nishida Kitarō published a book of the same title, knowing only Buber's name but nothing of his ideas. A comparison of these two works suggests certain fundamental differences between philosophies of being and philosophies of nothingness regarding the nature of human relationships. In particular, it points to the inherent tendency of the latter to remove moral responsibility and social consciousness to high but ineffective levels of abstraction
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hiroshi Kojima's Phenomenological Ontology.Marina Paola Banchetti-Robino - 2008 - Philosophy East and West 58 (2):163-189.
Martin Buber's I and Thou: Practicing Living Dialogue.Kenneth Kramer - 2003 - Paulist Press.
Born to Affirm the Eternal Recurrence.Jonathan R. Cohen - 1996 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 3 (3):1-11.
Buber's Way to I and Thou: An Historical Analysis and the First Publication of Martin Buber's Lectures Religion Als Gegenwart.Rivka Horwitz - 1978 - Schneider.
I and Thou: The Educational Lessons of Martin Buber's Dialogue with the Conflicts of His Times.W. J. Morgan & Alexandre Guilherme - 2012 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (9):979-996.
The Heidegger-Buber Controversy: The Status of the I-Thou.Ḥayim Gordon - 2001 - Greenwood Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #157,264 of 2,132,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #289,567 of 2,132,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.