Peoples’ Views About the Acceptability of Executive Bonuses and Compensation Policies

Journal of Business Ethics 127 (3):661-671 (2015)

We applied a technique borrowed from the field of bioethics to test whether justice-related factors influence laypersons’ decisions concerning business ethics. In the first experiment, participants judged the acceptability of remuneration policies and in the second that of executive bonuses. In each study, participants judged a set of 36 situations. To create the scenarios, we varied retributive justice—the amount of remuneration; procedural justice—the clarity of the procedure that determined the remuneration; distributive justice—the extent of the distribution of bonus payments amongst employees; and restorative justice—a special compensation for hazardous working conditions or accidents at work. K-means clustering of all 36 judgments revealed four different personal positions in both experiments. One group of people readily accepted all situations. The other three groups’ judgments were mainly a function of distributive justice modulated in different ways by the context determined by the other variables. Furthermore, people conceive of distributive justice as categorical: Acceptability judgments only increase if companies give bonuses to all employees. Granting bonuses to a subset does not increase acceptability. Our results are useful for policy makers and provide business ethics researchers with a novel technique
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2062-6
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,883
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What Stakeholder Theory is Not.Andrew C. Wicks - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (4):479-502.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Moral and Economic Defense of Executive Compensation.John Dobson - 2011 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 30 (1-2):59-70.
A Model Capturing Ethics and Executive Compensation.Waymond Rodgers & Susana Gago - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 48 (2):189-202.
Executive Compensation and Earnings Persistence.Allan S. Ashley & Simon S. M. Yang - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 50 (4):369-382.
A Fair Wage? Capping Executive Compensation.Julian Friedland - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 7:129-139.
Offering Bonuses for Reduced Fertility.Stephen Enke & Bryan D. Hickman - 1973 - Journal of Biosocial Science 5 (3):329-346.


Added to PP index

Total views
5 ( #1,019,421 of 2,266,170 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #852,654 of 2,266,170 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature