Traditional difference-score analyses of reasoning are flawed

Cognition 131 (1):75-91 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Stumbling on status: Abortion, stem cells, and faulty reasoning. [REVIEW]Karen Lebacqz - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (1):75-82.
On the information-processing demands of spatial reasoning.Sergio Morra - 2001 - Thinking and Reasoning 7 (4):347 – 365.
Inferential and non-inferential reasoning.Bart Streumer - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):1-29.
No problem for Aristotle's subject and predicate.Guy Politzer - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):298-299.
Neurosciences of action and noncausal theories.Don Gustafson - 2007 - Philosophical Psychology 20 (3):367–374.
Empirical Analyses of Causation.Douglas Kutach - 2009 - In Allan Hazlett (ed.), New Waves in Metaphysics. Palgrave-Macmillan.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-23

Downloads
15 (#893,994)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?