Bert Heinrichs
Universität Bonn
In this paper I propose to examine the concept of discrimination from an ethical viewpoint. In a preliminary part, I will point out which aspects of the subject matter I will focus on and which I will leave aside (II). On the basis of the Aristotelian principle “treat like cases alike”, I will continue with a very formal definition, according to which discrimination can be understood as acting in a way that implies that like cases are not treated alike. This leads to the difficult question of which cases are to be considered as “alike”, or which traits can serve as morally valid reasons for identifying cases as “unlike” (III). I will argue that this question cannot be answered independently from the specific circumstances and the normative premises referred to for describing these circumstances. My conclusion is that the concept of discrimination derives its “moral strength” solely from these normative premises. As a consequence, the use of the con- cept of discrimination can often be misleading since it falsely presupposes that there is agreement about the underlying normative premises (IV). Finally, I will illustrate the argumentation using “genetic discrimination” in connection with insurance contracts as an example (V).
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1515/9783110192476.1.97
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,784
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Untitled. [REVIEW]Peter Singer - 1993 - Ethics 103:807-810.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Learning to Discriminate: The Perfect Proxy Problem in Artificially Intelligent Criminal Sentencing.Benjamin Davies & Thomas Douglas - forthcoming - In Jesper Ryberg & Julian V. Roberts (eds.), Sentencing and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Discrimination : Discrimination : What is It and What Makes It Morally Wrong?Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2007 - In Jesper Ryberg, Thomas S. Petersen & Clark Wolf (eds.), New Waves in Applied Ethics. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Discrimination: An Interdisciplinary Analysis. [REVIEW]Walter Block - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (4):241 - 254.
Intentions and Discrimination in Hiring.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (1):55-74.
Can There Be Full Excuses for Morally Wrong Actions?Eduardo Rivera-lópez - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):124-142.
Imagining Evil (Or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Sopranos).James Harold - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 12:7-14.
Genetic Nondiscrimination and Health Care as an Entitlement.B. M. Kious - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):86-100.
Vegetarianism, Traditional Morality, and Moral Conservatism.David Detmer - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):39-48.


Added to PP index

Total views
26 ( #427,421 of 2,463,136 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #101,748 of 2,463,136 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes