Calvin and Bernard on freedom and necessity: A reply to Brümmer: Paul Helm

Religious Studies 30 (4):457-465 (1994)

It is argued that Calvin does not veer between two incompatible accounts of grace, freedom and necessity in Institutes II . 2, but presents a consistent position. The consistency is evident once it is seen that Calvin carefully distinguished between necessity and compulsion . For him not all necessitated acts are compelled, but all human acts which are the outcome of efficacious divine grace are necessitated by that grace. Because Calvin is consistent, there is no need to suppose that he has mistaken the causal sufficiency of divine saving grace for its causal importance
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0034412500023106
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,330
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Calvin at the Centre.Paul Helm - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
John Calvin's Ideas.Paul Helm - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Faith and Understanding.Paul Helm - 1997 - Wm. B. Eerdmans.


Added to PP index

Total views
10 ( #774,556 of 2,285,999 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #833,345 of 2,285,999 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature