Critical Notice: Why Killing Is Not Always Worse—and Is Sometimes Better—Than Letting Die

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):371-374 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The philosophical debate over the moral difference between killing and letting die has obvious relevance for the contemporary public debate over voluntary euthanasia. Winston Nesbitt claims to have shown that killing someone is, other things being equal, always worse than allowing someone to die. But this conclusion is illegitimate. While Nesbitt is correct when he suggests that killing is sometimes worse than letting die, this is not always the case. In this article, I argue that there are occasions when it is better to kill than to let die



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Killing and letting die.James Rachels - 2001 - In Lawrence C. Becker Mary Becker & Charlotte Becker (eds.), Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd Edition. Routledge.
Is Killing No Worse Than Letting Die?Winston Nesbitt - 1995 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):101-106.
Ambiguities in 'killing' and 'letting die'.Gary M. Atkinson - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (2):159-168.
Life-prolonging killings and their relevance to ethics.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (2):135-147.
On Killing and Letting Die.Daniel Dinello - 1971 - Analysis 31 (3):83 - 86.
The badness of killing and letting die.E. Carlson - 2001 - Journal of Value Inquiry 35 (4):535-539.
Killing and Letting Die.O. H. Green - 1980 - American Philosophical Quarterly 17 (3):195 - 204.


Added to PP

516 (#36,462)

6 months
41 (#96,601)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?