On nominalism


Authors
Geoffrey Hellman
University of Minnesota
Abstract
Probably there is no position in Goodman’s corpus that has generated greater perplexity and criticism than Goodman’s “nominalism”. As is abundantly clear from Goodman’s writings, it is not “abstract entities” generally that he questions—indeed, he takes sensory qualia as “basic” in his Carnap-inspired constructional system in Structure—but rather just those abstracta that are so crystal clear in their identity conditions, so fundamental to our thought, so prevalent and seemingly unavoidable in our discourse and theorizing that they have come to form the generally accepted framework for the most time-honored, exact, sophisticated, refined, central, and secure branch of human knowledge yet devised, mathematics itself! Of all the abstracta to question, why sets? Of course, Goodman gave his “reasons”, the unintelligibility of “generating” an infinitude of “constructed objects” automatically from any given object or objects. But critics have been quick to point out that set theory is intended not as a theory of what can be “generated” or “constructed” from given objects in any literal sense but rather as a theory of a certain realm of objects independently existing in their own right. “Construction” is a metaphor.
Keywords nominalism   mathematics   platonism   Burgess   Rosen   toread
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0031-8205
DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00086.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,164
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Parts of Classes.David LEWIS - 1991 - Blackwell.
Meaning and Necessity.Rudolf Carnap - 1947 - University of Chicago Press.
Realism in Mathematics.Penelope MADDY - 1990 - Oxford University Prress.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Plural Quantification and Classes.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2003 - Philosophia Mathematica 11 (1):67-81.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Anti-Nominalism Reconsidered.David Liggins - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (226):104–111.
Realism and Nominalism Revisited.Henry Babcock Veatch - 1954 - Milwaukee, Marquette University Press.
Nominalism and Intentionality.Daniel Stoljar - 1996 - Noûs 30 (2):221-241.
Nominalism and Inner Experience.Peter Bieri - 1982 - The Monist 65 (January):68-87.
Resemblance Nominalism and Counterparts.Alexander Bird - 2003 - Analysis 63 (3):221–228.
Paradigms and Russell's Resemblance Regress.Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (4):644 – 651.
Nominalism and Idealism.Herbert Hochberg - 2013 - Axiomathes 23 (2):213-234.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
89 ( #84,316 of 2,237,391 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #607,103 of 2,237,391 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature