Authors
Abstract
In his dialogue the Timaeus, Plato recognized two aspects of time, the past and the future, but not the present. In contrast, Aristotle's analysis of time in the Physics took its orientation from the 'now'. It is the latter path that Husserl follows with his conception of the 'original impression' (Urimpression). However, in certain parts of Husserl's Bernau Manuscripts, the present loses significance because of a novel interpretation of protention. This development, which revitalizes Plato's understanding of time, is furthered in Heidegger's late lecture Time and Being: the present can be understood on the basis of the 'withdrawal' which determines the mutual relation between the arrival as authentic future and the having-been as authentic past.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09672550701445191
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,100
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Phenomenological Problems for the Kairological Reading of Augenblick in Being and Time.Hakhamanesh Zangeneh - 2011 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (4):539 - 561.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
129 ( #67,978 of 2,324,384 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #140,489 of 2,324,384 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes