Responsibility for scientific misconduct in collaborative papers

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (3):423-430 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper concerns the responsibility of co-authors in cases of scientific misconduct. Arguments in research integrity guidelines and in the bioethics literature concerning authorship responsibilities are discussed. It is argued that it is unreasonable to claim that for every case where a research paper is found to be fraudulent, each author is morally responsible for all aspects of that paper, or that one particular author has such a responsibility. It is further argued that it is more constructive to specify what task responsibilities come with different roles in a project and describe what kinds of situations or events call for some kind of action, and what the appropriate actions might be.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,678

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Criminalization of scientific misconduct.William Bülow & Gert Helgesson - 2019 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 22 (2):245-252.
Call for papers.[author unknown] - 1998 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1 (1):95-95.
Responsible conduct of research.Adil E. Shamoo - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by David B. Resnik.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-10

Downloads
37 (#429,415)

6 months
13 (#281,749)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?