Religious Studies 37 (3):249-258 (2001)

Authors
Abstract
I argue on three distinct grounds that the contrast between speaking and revealing is nothing like so sharp as Wolterstorff maintains in Divine Discourse. Speaking may be revealing: in speaking a person may reveal much about himself. Putative divine speaking can only be made intelligible given a background of what I refer to as INIS revelation, and in revealing, or more exactly, in having revealed, God may still speak.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0034412501005649
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,289
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

From Cover to Cover? A Critique of Wolterstorff's Theory of the Bible as Divine Discourse.Maarten Wisse - 2002 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 52 (3):159-173.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Divine Revelation and Human Person.Balázs M. Mezei - 2006 - Philosophy and Theology 18 (2):337-354.
Speaking for Others: Epistemology and Ethics.Dan Haggerty - 2009 - Social Philosophy Today 25:109-122.
Truth and Exemplarism.John Peterson - 2004 - International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):69-77.
Speaking to Trees.Erazim Kohák - 1992 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 6 (2-3):371-388.
On Reading God the Author.Merold Westphal - 2001 - Religious Studies 37 (3):271-291.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
41 ( #259,745 of 2,444,974 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,173 of 2,444,974 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes