Journal of Business Ethics 50 (1):33-44 (2004)

Christine Hemingway
Aston University
In this theoretical paper, motives for CSR are considered. An underlying assumption is that the commercial imperative is not the sole driver of CSR decision-making in private sector companies, but that the formal adoption and implementation of CSR by corporations could be associated with the changing personal values of individual managers. These values may find expression through the opportunity to exercise discretion, which may arise in various ways. It is suggested that in so far as CSR initiatives represent individuals' values, so the responsibility in evidence is less obviously corporate. Our emphasis on personal initiative is intended to counter a tendency to view the corporation as the agent, and may serve to remind us that individuals can, indeed, make a difference.
Keywords corporate social responsibility (CSR)  managerial discretion  motives  personal values  social responsibility
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000020964.80208.c9
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,177
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Egoism.Kurt Baier - 1990 - In Peter Singer (ed.), A Companion to Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell.
Business Social Responsibility: A Source of Social Capital?Jeremy Moon - 2001 - Philosophy of Management 1 (3):35-45.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Small Business Champions for Corporate Social Responsibility.Heledd Jenkins - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 67 (3):241-256.

View all 141 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
243 ( #44,812 of 2,499,418 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,699 of 2,499,418 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes