A hybrid formal theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence

Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (2):123-152 (2010)
Abstract
This paper presents a theory of reasoning with evidence in order to determine the facts in a criminal case. The focus is on the process of proof, in which the facts of the case are determined, rather than on related legal issues, such as the admissibility of evidence. In the literature, two approaches to reasoning with evidence can be distinguished, one argument-based and one story-based. In an argument-based approach to reasoning with evidence, the reasons for and against the occurrence of an event, e.g., based on witness testimony, are central. In a story-based approach, evidence is evaluated and interpreted from the perspective of the factual stories as they may have occurred in a case, e.g., as they are defended by the prosecution. In this paper, we argue that both arguments and narratives are relevant and useful in the reasoning with and interpretation of evidence. Therefore, a hybrid approach is proposed and formally developed, doing justice to both the argument-based and the narrative-based perspective. By the formalization of the theory and the associated graphical representations, our proposal is the basis for the design of software developed as a tool to make sense of the evidence in complex cases.
Keywords Argumentation  Stories  Legal evidence
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10506-010-9092-x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,349
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Argumentation Schemes.Douglas Walton, Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
Legal Argumentation and Evidence.Douglas Walton - 2002 - Pennsylvania State University Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Argument Diagram Extraction From Evidential Bayesian Networks.Jeroen Keppens - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (2):109-143.
Legal Stories and the Process of Proof.Floris Bex & Bart Verheij - 2013 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 21 (3):253-278.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2010-07-31

Total downloads
28 ( #188,049 of 2,193,702 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #290,983 of 2,193,702 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature