David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (3):pp. 478-480 (2008)
Aristotle on Definition is an exceptional piece of scholarship. Its arguments are carefully justified, sophisticated, and far-reaching. Those interested in Aristotle's theory of definition will find this book a nice compliment to David Charles' Meaning and Essence. Whereas Charles examines Aristotle's theory of syllogistic definitions, Deslauriers focuses mainly on the concept of immediate definitions .It is impossible to do justice to the entire book. In what follows I shall attempt to isolate one of its main lines of argument to give the reader a sense of the book's content.In chapter 2, Deslauriers draws our attention to four types of definition identified in the Posterior Analytics and sets out to explore the differences between them. She focuses on two basic kinds of definition, what she calls "syllogistic" definitions and "immediate" definitions. Syllogistic definitions are accounts that indicate what something is through a middle term and are formulated by rearranging the terms of a demonstrative syllogism, whereas immediate definitions express propositions that cannot be displayed in demonstrations. Instead, they are arrived at and displayed through division by genus and differentiae. According to Deslauriers, Aristotle's account of these two basic kinds of
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Aristotle (1976). Aristotle's Posterior Analytics. Clarendon Press.
David Charles (ed.) (2010). Definition in Greek Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Devin Henry (2009). Aristotle’s Generation of Animals. In Georgios Anagnostopoulos (ed.), A Companion to Aristotle. Blackwell-Wiley
James G. Lennox & Robert Bolton (eds.) (2010). Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle: Essays in Honor of Allan Gotthelf. Cambridge University Press.
Oded Balaban (1995). The Modern Misunderstanding of Aristotle's Theory of Motion. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 26 (1):1 - 10.
Walter E. Wehrle (1994). The Definition of Soul in Aristotle's de Anima II 1 is Not Analogous to the Definition of Snub. Ancient Philosophy 14 (2):297-317.
Paloma Pérez-Ilzarbe (2009). Definition and Demonstration: Aristotle, Averroes, Grosseteste. In A. C. Storck (ed.), In Aristotelis Analytica Posteriora - Estudos acerca da recepção medieval dos Segundos Analíticos. Linus Editores
John MacFarlane (2000). Aristotle's Definition of Anagnorisis. American Journal of Philology 121 (3):367-383.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #114,091 of 1,903,038 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #324,600 of 1,903,038 )
How can I increase my downloads?