Authors
Devin Henry
University of Western Ontario
Abstract
It has become somewhat of a platitude to call Aristotle the first epigenesist insofar as he thought form and structure emerged gradually from an unorganized, amorphous embryo. But modern biology now recognizes two senses of “epigenesis”. The first is this more familiar idea about the gradual emergence of form and structure, which is traditionally opposed to the idea of preformationism. But modern biologists also use “epigenesis” to emphasize the context-dependency of the process itself. Used in this sense development is not simply the unfolding of a pre-determined sequence of changes specified in advance by the organism’s genotype. It is also sensitive to inputs from the internal and external environment, which help determine in real-time which of the many potential developmental pathways are actualized during the process. Within this paradigm developing embryos are viewed as dynamic and responsive systems that react to inputs from the internal and external environment ‘on the fly’. In this paper I argue that, while Aristotle was an epigenesist in the first sense, he would have rejected epigenesis in the more modern sense. First, Aristotle’s model of choice for a developing embryo is the automaton that executes a set of preset movements (GA 734b9-13, 741b7-15). The automatons he has in mind are not dynamic AI systems capable of modifying their behaviour on the fly in response to environmental cues but completely deterministic mechanisms whose movements are fixed by their original design. Second, given Aristotle’s views about the different kinds of causal powers there are, it looks like only intentional agents endowed with actual decision-making powers could be capable of the sort of plasticity at the core of a more dynamic epigenesis. For that kind of epigenesis requires powers for alternative outcomes, and Aristotle is explicit that such powers require rational desires (προαίρεσις) that control which of those alternatives to bring about. If I am right, then he could not have made sense of the idea of a developing embryo (as a non-intentional system) making adjustments to its phenotype on the fly in response to emerging problems and opportunities, given the conceptual resources available to him.
Keywords Epigenesis and Preformationism  Aristotle  Generation of Animals  Ancient Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Aristotle on Teleology.Monte Ransome Johnson - 2008 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Keywords and Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biology.Brian Hall & Wendy Olson - 2007 - Journal of the History of Biology 40 (4):776-777.
Keywords and Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biology.Brian K. Hall & Wendy M. Olson - 2004 - Journal of the History of Biology 37 (2):406-408.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Aristotle's Ontology of Change.Mark Sentesy - 2020 - Chicago, IL, USA: Northwestern University Press.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Aristotle’s Generation of Animals.Devin Henry - 2009 - In Georgios Anagnostopoulos (ed.), A Companion to Aristotle. Blackwell-Wiley.
Aristotle on Monsters and the Generation of Kinds.Thomas V. Upton - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (1):21-36.
Aristotle on the Sense-Organs.T. K. Johansen - 1997 - Cambridge University Press.
Merely Living Animals in Aristotle.Refik Güremen - 2015 - Journal of Ancient Philosophy 9 (1):115.
Aristotle on Touch.Józef Bremer - 2011 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 16 (1):73-87.
Aristotle on the Mechanisms of Inheritance.Devin Henry - 2006 - Journal of the History of Biology 39 (3):425-455.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-12-04

Total views
312 ( #31,008 of 2,462,377 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #23,127 of 2,462,377 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes