Argumentation 17 (4):405-419 (2003)
| Abstract |
In this paper, it is explained that a dialogical approach to complex argumentation can be fruitful for solving two important problems concerning the analysis of the argumentation structure. First, such an approach makes it possible to clarify the distinction between coordinative and multiple argumentation structures, and to identify clues in the presentation for each of these structures. Second, a dialogical approach can provide a basis for dealing more adequately with refutations of counterarguments
|
| Keywords | argumentation structure convergent argumentation coordinative argumentation counterarguments indicators linked argumentation multiple argumentation refutations |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1023/A:1026390419589 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments: A Theory of Argument Structure.James B. Freeman - 1991 - Berlin and New York: Foris Publications.
Practical Reasoning in Natural Language.Stephen Naylor Thomas - 1973 - Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall.
On the Distinction Between Convergent and Linked Arguments.David A. Conway - 1991 - Informal Logic 13 (3).
Citations of this work BETA
The Ways of Criticism.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Jan Albert van Laar - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):199-227.
Pragma-Dialectics and the Function of Argumentation.Christoph Lumer - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (1):41-69.
Reasoning and Argumentation: Towards an Integrated Psychology of Argumentation.Jos Hornikx & Ulrike Hahn - 2012 - Thinking and Reasoning 18 (3):225 - 243.
View all 14 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
A.F. Snoeck Henkemans,Analysing Complex Argumentation: The Reconstruction of Multiple and Coordinatively Compound Argumentation in a Critical Discussion. [REVIEW]Robert C. Pinto - 1994 - Argumentation 8 (3):314-318.
Analysing Complex Argumentation: The Reconstruction of Multiple and Coordinatively Compound Argumentation in a Critical Discussion.Snoeck Henkemans & Arnolda Francisca - 1992 - Sicsat.
Petitio Principii and Circular Argumentation as Seen From a Theory of Dialectical Structures.Gregor Betz - 2010 - Synthese 175 (3):327-349.
A Dialogical Theory of Legal Discussions:Pragma-Dialectical Analysis and Evaluation of Legalargumentation.Eveline T. Feteris - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):115-135.
Dialectical Argumentation with Argumentation Schemes: An Approach to Legal Logic. [REVIEW]Bart Verheij - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):167-195.
The Ways of Criticism.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Jan Albert van Laar - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):199-227.
Rhetorical Analysis Within a Pragma-Dialectical Framework.Frans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (3):293-305.
Dichotomies and Oppositions in Legal Argumentation.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2010 - Ratio Juris 23 (2):229-257.
A Pragma-Dialectical Approach of the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context.Eveline T. Feteris - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (3):349-367.
Argumentative Bluff in Eristic Discussion: An Analysis and Evaluation.Jan Albert van Laar - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (3):383-398.
A Survey of 25 Years of Research on Legal Argumentation.E. T. Feteris - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (3):355-376.
Solving a Murder Case by Asking Critical Questions: An Approach to Fact-Finding in Terms of Argumentation and Story Schemes. [REVIEW]Floris Bex & Bart Verheij - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (3):325-353.
Argumentation and Fallacy in the Justification of the 2003 War on Iraq.Ahmed Sahlane - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (4):459-488.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-09-11
Total views
54 ( #208,135 of 2,498,304 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #118,765 of 2,498,304 )
2010-09-11
Total views
54 ( #208,135 of 2,498,304 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #118,765 of 2,498,304 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
