Authors
Abstract
It is commonly thought that there is some tension between the second law of thermodynam- ics and the time reversal invariance of the microdynamics. Recently, however, Jos Uffink has argued that the origin of time reversal non-invariance in thermodynamics is not in the second law. Uffink argues that the relationship between the second law and time reversal invariance depends on the formulation of the second law. He claims that a recent version of the second law due to Lieb and Yngvason allows irreversible processes, yet is time reversal invariant. In this paper, I attempt to spell out the traditional argument for incompatibility between the second law and time reversal invariant dynamics, making the assumptions on which it depends explicit. I argue that this argument does not vary with different versions of the second law and can be formulated for Lieb and Yngvason's version as for other versions. Uffink's argument regarding time reversal invariance in Lieb and Yngvason is based on a certain symmetry of some of their axioms. However, these axioms do not constitute the full expression of the second law in their system
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsb.2014.06.001
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,417
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Bluff Your Way in the Second Law of Thermodynamics.Jos Uffink - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (3):305-394.
The Origins of Time-Asymmetry in Thermodynamics: The Minus First Law.Harvey R. Brown & Jos Uffink - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (4):525-538.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Impossible Process: Thermodynamic Reversibility.John D. Norton - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 55:43-61.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

When We Do (and Do Not) Have a Classical Arrow of Time.Bryan W. Roberts - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):1112-1124.
Comment On: “Causality and the Arrow of Classical Time”, by Fritz Rohrlich.Carlo Rovelli - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (3):397-405.
The Logic of Time Reversal.E. J. Post - 1979 - Foundations of Physics 9 (1-2):129-161.
The Arrow of Time in the Equations of Motion.Fritz Rohrlich - 1998 - Foundations of Physics 28 (7):1045-1056.
On the Time Reversal Invariance of Classical Electromagnetic Theory.David B. Malament - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (2):295-315.
Causality and the Arrow of Classical Time.Fritz Rohrlich - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31 (1):1-13.
Two Views on Time Reversal.Jill North - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (2):201-223.
Is Classical Mechanics Time Reversal Invariant?Steven F. Savitt - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (3):907-913.
Time and Irreversibility in an Accelerating Universe.Gustavo E. Romero & Daniela Pérez - 2011 - International Journal of Modern Physics D 20:2831-2838.
What Time Reversal Invariance is and Why It Matters.John Earman - 2002 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (3):245 – 264.
Kramers Degeneracy Without Eigenvectors.Bryan W. Roberts - 2012 - Physical Review A 86 (3):034103.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-06-30

Total views
38 ( #283,529 of 2,449,099 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #299,478 of 2,449,099 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes