Explanation and rationality naturalized

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (1):30-58 (2010)
Familiar accounts have it that one explains thoughts or actions by showing them to be rational. It is common to find that the standards of rationality presupposed in these accounts are drawn from what would be thought to be aprioristic sources. I advance an argument to show this must be mistaken. But, recent work in epistemology and on rationality takes a less aprioristic approach to such standards. Does the new (psychological or cognitive scientific) realism in accounts of rationality itself significantly improve the prospects for unproblematic forms of rationalizing explanation? Do earlier misgivings about rationalizing explanation ring hollow when the rationality to be attributed is "naturalized"? Answer: while explanation in terms of naturalized rationality would be free of one fatal flaw possessed by explanation in terms of rationality understood in the traditional fashion, it would yet have parallel flaws
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0048393109350680
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,807
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Empirical Case for Two Systems of Reasoning.Steven A. Sloman - 1996 - Psychological Bulletin 119 (1):3-22.
Explanation and Invariance in the Special Sciences.James Woodward - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (2):197-254.
4 Decades of Scientific Explanation.Wesley C. Salmon - 1989 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13:3-219.
Strong and Weak Justification.Alvin I. Goldman - 1988 - Philosophical Perspectives 2:51-69.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Narratives and Action Explanation.T. Uebel - 2012 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (1):31-67.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Ontology of Explanation.David-Hillel Ruben - 1989 - In Fred D'Agostino & I. C. Jarvie (eds.), Freedom and Rationality. Reidel. pp. 67--85.
Popper, Rationality and the Possibility of Social Science.Danny Frederick - 2013 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 28 (1):61-75.
Resisting Explanation.G. Randolph Mayes - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (4):361-380.
Is Naturalized Epistemology Experientially Vacuous?Michael G. Barnhart - 1996 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 3 (2):1-5.
Rationality and Psychological Explanation Without Language.Jose Luis Bermudez - 2002 - In Jose Luis Bermudez & Alan Millar (eds.), Reason and Nature. Clarendon Press.
Delusions as Performance Failures.Philip Gerrans - 2001 - Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 6 (3).
Added to PP index

Total downloads
102 ( #54,881 of 2,214,511 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #134,247 of 2,214,511 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature