Tobias Henschen
University of Freiburg
The argument from inductive risk, as developed by Rudner and others, famously concludes that the scientist qua scientist makes value judgments. The paper aims to show that trust in the soundness of the argument is overrated – that philosophers who endorse its conclusion fail to refute two of the most important objections that have been raised to its soundness: Jeffrey’s objection that the genuine task of the scientist is to assign probabilities to hypotheses, and Levi’s objection that the argument is ambiguous about decisions about how to act and decisions about what to believe, that only the former presuppose value judgments, and that qua scientist, the scientist only needs to decide what to believe.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s13194-021-00409-x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,199
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal.Heather Douglas - 2009 - University of Pittsburgh Press.
The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments.Richard Rudner - 1953 - Philosophy of Science 20 (1):1-6.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On the mitigation of inductive risk.Gabriele Contessa - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (3):1-14.
Acceptance, Values, and Inductive Risk.Daniel Steel - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):818-828.
On Value-Laden Science.Zina B. Ward - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 85:54-62.
The Deductive/Inductive Distinction.George Bowles - 1994 - Informal Logic 16 (3):159-184.
High Confirmation and Inductive Validity.David Botting - 2016 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 46 (1):119-142.


Added to PP index

Total views
12 ( #812,395 of 2,518,075 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #272,378 of 2,518,075 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes