In Georgia Irby (ed.), Blackwell Companion to Ancient Science, Medicine and Technology. Wiley-Blackwell (forthcoming)

Devin Henry
University of Western Ontario
The intellectual history of evolutionary theory really does not begin in earnest until the late seventeenth/early eighteenth century. Prior to that, the idea that species might have evolved over time was not a serious possibility for most naturalists and philosophers. There is certainly no substantive debate in antiquity about evolution in the modern sense. There were really only two competing explanations for how living things came to have the parts they do: design or blind chance. Ancient Greek Atomism, for example, taught that all composite bodies, including living things, are generated through the random collision of atoms as they rebel and move in the void. Plato and Aristotle both dismissed this possibility on the grounds that living things are too complex and too well-adapted to be products of chance. This eventually became the central premise in Galen’s own Argument from Design. That species forms might have gradually evolved over time by a process of natural selection was not seen as a plausible alternative. Of course, such a theory had been proposed by Empedocles in the fifth century BCE. But because his theory still relied heavily on chance, it was not taken seriously by any of the later ancient Greek or Roman thinkers. My aim in this paper is to investigate the reasons why evolutionary thinking failed to gain momentum in antiquity after its introduction by Empedocles.
Keywords Evolution  Empedocles  Aristotle  Plato  Galen  Argument from Design
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Sober on Intelligent Design. [REVIEW]Sahotra Sarkar - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (3):683-691.
The Discovery of Evolution.David Young - 2007 - Cambridge University Press, in Association with Natural History Museum, London.
Changing Conceptions of Species.Bradley E. Wilson - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (3):405-420.
The Evidence for Evolution.Alan R. Rogers - 2011 - University of Chicago Press.
Michael Ruse's Design for Living.Robert J. Richards - 2004 - Journal of the History of Biology 37 (1):25 - 38.
Effluvia: Empedocles Studies.James Eric Butler - 2005 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (2):215-231.
Chance and Natural Selection.John Beatty - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (2):183-211.


Added to PP index

Total views
215 ( #49,421 of 2,462,377 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #45,610 of 2,462,377 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes