Prof. Dr. Klaus Hentschel
Universität Stuttgart
The manipulation of materials, and to some extent also their systematic classification, form an integral part of the skills and culture of all societies. Yet it took long for proper sciences to develop out of many processing procedures, tapping the accumulated knowledge about specific material characteristics. In the late 20th century an overarching science of workable materials emerged: materials science. This concept and term originated from major boosts in materials research during WWII and the Cold War, first financed by the U.S. Department of Defense and the Advanced Research Project Agency. The COSMAT-Report from 1974, written by the American Presidential Science Advisory Committee’s „Committee on the Survey of Materials Science and Engineering" four years after its inception, and subsequent reports heralded in the second institutionalization phase of materials science in the USA and with some delay also elsewhere. As the field continued to expand, the demand grew from within in the late 1990s for disciplinary status. This article sorts these claims from the various camps and sets them in the context of unfolding institutional change. The developments within the German-speaking realm, thus far unduly neglected in these debates, are added. I close with a systematic discussion of eight indicator arguments for or against a convergence of this complex field of research into a single coherent discipline. Against Bensaude-Vincent’s thesis that materials science still is an “aggregation of fragments of knowledge", I argue that by 2010 materials science did indeed achieve disciplinary status in a historically rare and enduring process of discipline formation through “emergence by integration" rather than by differentiation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s00048-010-0046-x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,593
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Historical Ontology.Ian Hacking - 2002 - Harvard University Press.
Historical Ontology.Mary Tjiattas - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (1):136-138.
Changes in the Design of Scanning Tunneling Microscopic Images From 1980 to 1990.Jochen Hennig - 2004 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 8 (2):36-55.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Concept of Materials in Historical PerspectiveDas Konzept von Werkstoffen in Historischer Perspektive.Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent - 2011 - NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 19 (1):107-123.
Nanotechnologie: Eine neue soziale Dynamik an der Schnittstelle zwischen Wissenschaft und Öffentlichkeit.Joachim Schummer - 2011 - NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 19 (2):147-167.
Das Konzept von Werkstoffen in historischer Perspektive.Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent - 2011 - NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 19 (1):107-123.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Unpacking Digital Material Mediation.Heather Wiltse - 2014 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 18 (3):154-182.
Editors of Voprosy Filosofii: Synopses of Remaining Reports.[author unknown] - 1976 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 15:91-104.
The Forgetting of 'Crowded' and 'Isolated' Materials.C. E. Buxton & E. B. Newman - 1940 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 26 (2):180.


Added to PP index

Total views
6 ( #1,113,415 of 2,462,070 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #448,768 of 2,462,070 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes