Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):27-41 (2012)

The paper contributes to the current discussion on the role of participatory methods in the context of technology assessment (TA) and science and technology (S&T) governance. It is argued that TA has to be understood as a form of democratic policy consulting in the sense of the Habermasian model of a “pragmatist” relation of science and politics. This notion implies that public participation is an indispensable element of TA in the context of policy advice. Against this background, participatory TA (pTA) is defended against recent criticism of procedures of lay participation which states that pTA is lacking impact on S&T decision making, that pTA instead of opening S&T policies to new perspectives is used as a means to support mainstream S&T policy and that in pTA procedure the authentic lay perspective is systematically contorted by dominant expert knowledge
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10202-012-0122-5
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,554
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Technology Assessment and Ethics.Barbara Skorupinski & Konrad Ott - 2002 - Poiesis and Praxis 1 (2):95-122.


Added to PP index

Total views
28 ( #349,107 of 2,331,149 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #589,978 of 2,331,149 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes