A Legal Right to Do Legal Wrong

Oxford Journal of Legal Studies (1):gqt022 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The literature, as are the intuitions of many, is sceptical as to the coherence of ‘legal rights to do legal wrong’. A right to do wrong is a right against interference with wrongdoing. A legal right to do legal wrong is, therefore, a right against legal enforcement of legal duty. It is, in other words, a right that shields the right holder’s legal wrongdoing. The sceptics notwithstanding, the category of ‘legal right to do legal wrong’ coheres with the concepts of ‘right’ and ‘legality’. In fact, once the parameters and features of the category of ‘legal right to do legal wrong’ are clarified, it becomes apparent that positive law contains actual doctrines that have the structure of a right to do wrong. One example is the doctrine of diplomatic immunity. This, and other examples of normatively sound legal doctrines that constitute legal rights to do legal wrong, demonstrate that such rights are not only conceptually coherent, but at times are normatively valuable. Moreover, looking to the law helps detect a category of rights to do wrong that has thus far gone wholly undetected in the literature, which is immunity from liability for violation of duty



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,659

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Defending the Right To Do Wrong.Ori J. Herstein - 2012 - Law and Philosophy 31 (3):343-365.
The right to bequeath as a common legal power.Luft Constantin & Gutmann Thomas - 2022 - In Schmidt am Busch Hans-Christoph, Halliday Daniel & Gutmann Thomas (eds.), Inheritance and the Right to Bequeath: Legal and Philosophical Perspectives. Oxon/New York: Routledge. pp. 76-94.
A Positive Account of Property Rights.David Friedman - 1994 - Social Philosophy and Policy 11 (2):1-16.
Two types of legal wrongdoing.M. E. Newhouse - 2016 - Legal Theory 22 (1):59-75.
The Legal Relation: Legal Theory after Legal Positivism.Alexander Somek - 2017 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Three Rationales for a Legal Right to Mental Integrity.Thomas Douglas & Lisa Forsberg - 2021 - In S. Ligthart, D. van Toor, T. Kooijmans, T. Douglas & G. Meynen (eds.), Neurolaw: Advances in Neuroscience, Justice and Security. Palgrave Macmillan.


Added to PP

125 (#146,141)

6 months
33 (#121,277)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ori Herstein
King's College London

Citations of this work

Rights.Leif Wenar - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references