Philosophical Psychology 22 (2):167 – 186 (2009)
Appraisal theories of emotion generally presuppose that emotions are “directed at” various items. They also hold that emotions have motivational properties. However, although it coheres well with their views, they have yet to seriously develop the idea that the function of emotional direction is to guide those properties. I argue that this “guidance hypothesis” can open up a promising new field of research in emotion theory. But I also argue that before appraisal theorists can take full advantage of it, they must drop their further assumption that to determine an emotion's direction, one need only retrace the process that caused it. Contrary to this “retracing view,” I argue for an “independence thesis”: directed emotions are produced by two functionally independent sub-processes. The first, “affect-causation,” functions in part to produce a state with certain motivational properties given certain representations. The second, “affect-direction,” has the function of optimally guiding those motivational properties by associating them with representations that may properly be quite dissimilar from the causal ones. By provisionally adopting the independence thesis and empirically testing the guidance hypothesis, I argue that appraisal theorists stand a good chance of significantly increasing the explanatory power of their theories.
|Keywords||Emotion Appraisal Causation Direction Lazarus Prinz|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of the Emotions.Jesse J. Prinz - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
What Emotions Really Are: The Problem of Psychological Categories.E. Griffiths Paul - 1997 - University of Chicago Press.
The Study of Instinct.N. Tinbergen - 1954 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 5 (17):72-76.
The Structure of Emotions: Investigations in Cognitive Philosophy.Robert M. Gordon - 1987 - Cambridge University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
On Knowing How I Feel About That—A Process-Reliabilist Approach.Larry A. Herzberg - 2016 - Acta Analytica 31 (4):419-438.
Similar books and articles
The Causal Status of Emotions in Consciousness.Jason T. Ramsay & Marc D. Lewis - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):215-216.
The Somatic Appraisal Model of Affect: Paradigm for Educational Neuroscience and Neuropedagogy.Kathryn E. Patten - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (1):87-97.
Toward a "Machiavellian" Theory of Emotional Appraisal.Paul E. Griffiths - 2004 - In D. Evans & Pierre Cruse (eds.), Emotion, Evolution, and Rationality. Oxford University Press.
Amalgams and the Power of Analytical Chemistry: Affective Science Needs to Decompose the Appraisal-Emotion Interaction.David Sander & Klaus R. Scherer - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):216-217.
Appraisal Theories of Emotions.Aaron Ben-Ze’Ev - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22 (April):129-143.
Enactive Appraisal.Giovanna Colombetti - 2007 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (4):527-546.
Added to index2010-05-07
Total downloads41 ( #127,878 of 2,178,112 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,663 of 2,178,112 )
How can I increase my downloads?