Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):383-403 (2001)
This target article is concerned with the implications of the surprisingly different experimental practices in economics and in areas of psychology relevant to both economists and psychologists, such as behavioral decision making. We consider four features of experimentation in economics, namely, script enactment, repeated trials, performance-based monetary payments, and the proscription against deception, and compare them to experimental practices in psychology, primarily in the area of behavioral decision making. Whereas economists bring a precisely defined “script” to experiments for participants to enact, psychologists often do not provide such a script, leaving participants to infer what choices the situation affords. By often using repeated experimental trials, economists allow participants to learn about the task and the environment; psychologists typically do not. Economists generally pay participants on the basis of clearly defined performance criteria; psychologists usually pay a flat fee or grant a fixed amount of course credit. Economists virtually never deceive participants; psychologists, especially in some areas of inquiry, often do. We argue that experimental standards in economics are regulatory in that they allow for little variation between the experimental practices of individual researchers. The experimental standards in psychology, by contrast, are comparatively laissez-faire. We believe that the wider range of experimental practices in psychology reflects a lack of procedural regularity that may contribute to the variability of empirical findings in the research fields under consideration. We conclude with a call for more research on the consequences of methodological preferences, such as the use on monetary payments, and propose a “do-it-both-ways” rule regarding the enactment of scripts, repetition of trials, and performance-based monetary payments. We also argue, on pragmatic grounds, that the default practice should be not to deceive participants. Key Words: behavioral decision making; cognitive illusions; deception; experimental design; experimental economics; experimental practices; financial incentives; learning; role playing.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Magic at the Marketplace: Choice Blindness for the Taste of Jam and the Smell of Tea.L. Hall, P. Johansson, B. Tärning, S. Sikström & T. Deutgen - 2010 - Cognition 117 (1):54-61.
A Parametric Analysis of Prospect Theory's Functionals for the General Population.Adam S. Booij, Bernard M. S. Van Praag & Gijs van de Kuilen - 2010 - Theory and Decision 68 (1-2):115-148.
Artificiality: The Tension Between Internal and External Validity in Economic Experiments.Arthur Schram - 2005 - Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (2):225-237.
The Priority Heuristic: Making Choices Without Trade-Offs.Eduard Brandstätter, Gerd Gigerenzer & Ralph Hertwig - 2006 - Psychological Review 113 (2):409-432.
A Probabilistic Ghost in the Experimental Machine.Dorian Jullien & Nicolas Vallois - 2014 - Journal of Economic Methodology 21 (3):232-250.
Similar books and articles
Money, Lies, and Replicability: On the Need for Empirically Grounded Experimental Practices and Interdisciplinary Discourse.Ralph Hertwig & Andreas Ortmann - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):433-444.
Variability is Not Uniformly Bad: The Practices of Psychologists Generate Research Questions.Scott A. Huettel & Gregory Lockhead - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):418-419.
The Contribution of Game Theory to Experimental Design in the Behavioral Sciences.Herbert Gintis - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):411-412.
Form and Function in Experimental Design.Alvin E. Roth - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):427-428.
Economic and Psychological Experimental Methodology: Separating the Wheat From the Chaff.Hasker P. Davis & Robert L. Durham - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):405-406.
Doing It Both Ways – Experimental Practice and Heuristic Context.Glenn W. Harrison & E. Elisabet Rutström - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):413-414.
Different Perspectives of Human Behavior Entail Different Experimental Practices.Ramzi Suleiman - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):429-429.
Other Scientific Purposes, Other Methodological Ways.Marie-Paule Lecoutre & Bruno Lecoutre - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):421-421.
The Game-Theoretic Innocence of Experimental Behavioral Psychology.Don Ross - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):426-427.
Typological Thinking, Statistical Significance, and the Methodological Divergence of Experimental Psychology and Economics.Charles F. Blaich & Humberto Barreto - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):405-405.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads154 ( #29,869 of 2,158,404 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #133,350 of 2,158,404 )
How can I increase my downloads?