American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (4):589-603 (2011)
The aim of this essay is to point to some of the problems that arise in trying to clarify the distinction frequently made between literal and non-literal ways of understanding certain religious beliefs, such as the belief in the resurrection of Christ. The disagreement is sometimes taken to concern whether the words usedin the expression of belief are to be understood in a literal or a non-literal sense. It may alternatively be taken to concern whether or not religious utterances are to be understood as factual assertions. It is argued that, in either case, the application of the relevant distinction to religious expressions is problematic. It is suggested that the disagreement should be understood as one of religious attitude rather than of the interpretation of utterances
|Keywords||Catholic Tradition Contemporary Philosophy History of Philosophy Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Literal Meaning, Conventional Meaning and First Meaning.C. J. L. Talmage - 1994 - Erkenntnis 40 (2):213 - 225.
Belief-Based Exemptions: Are Religious Beliefs Special?Gemma Cornelissen - 2012 - Ratio Juris 25 (1):85-109.
Malapropisms and Davidson's Theories of Literal Meaning.John Michael McGuire - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 6:93-97.
First Person and Third Person Reasons and Religious Epistemology.Linda Zagzebski - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (2):285 - 304.
Religious Diversity and its Challenges to Religious Belief.Nathan L. King - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (4):830-853.
Religious Belief and the Epistemology of Disagreement.Michael Thune - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (8):712-724.
Religious Disagreement: Internal and External. [REVIEW]Dennis Potter - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):21-31.
Faith, Probability and Infinite Passion.Robert C. Koons - 1993 - Faith and Philosophy 10 (2):145-160.
Are Evolutionary/Cognitive Theories of Religion Relevant for Philosophy of Religion?Gregory R. Peterson - 2010 - Zygon 45 (3):545-557.
A Deflationary Account of Metaphor.Dan Sperber & Deirdre Wilson - 2008 - In Ray Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 84-105.
Taking Desirelessness () Seriously.Christopher G. Framarin - 2005 - Asian Philosophy 15 (2):143 – 155.
Added to index2012-09-18
Total downloads17 ( #285,171 of 2,172,604 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,028 of 2,172,604 )
How can I increase my downloads?