Metaphysics and Contemporary Science: Why the question of the synthetic a priori shouldn’t not be abandoned prematurely

Kay Herrmann
Technische Universität Chemnitz-Zwickau
The problem of synthetic judgements touches on the question of whether philosophy can draw independent statements about reality in the first place. For Kant, the synthetic judgements a priori formulate the conditions of the possibility for objectively valid knowledge. Despite the principle fallibility of its statements, modern science aims for objective knowledge. This gives the topic of synthetic a priori unbroken currency. This paper aims to show that a modernized version of transcendental philosophy, if it is to be feasible at all, must “bid farewell” to the concept of being “free of empiricism” or the “purity” of the a priori. Approaches to this end can already been found in Kant’s reflections on non-pure synthetic knowledge. Moreover, the a priori validity of knowledge does not exclude the possibility that it can be discovered empirically. In keeping with Kant, Fries and Nelson anticipated this separation (usually first attributed to Reichenbach) between the validity and discovery context of knowledge and pointed out that the a priori could be discovered empirically, but never proven. There are currently still good reasons why transcendental philosophical concepts are of fundamental importance for modern science, although it must not be overlooked that even within the framework of a modernized transcendental philosophy, several unsolved problems remain or are raised. For example, the irredeemability of the universal validity and necessary claims of the a priori, the problem of a clear demarcation between the phenomenal and noumenal world. Moreover, the “beautiful structure” or the Kantian system, which constituted its persuasive power, is lost.
Keywords synthetic judgments a priori  transcendental philosophy  non-pure synthetic a priori knowledge  noumenal  phenomenal  objective knowledge  Immanuel Kant  Jakob Friedrich Fries  Leonard Nelson
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Does Kant Demand Explanations for All Synthetic A Priori Claims?Colin Marshall - 2014 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (3):549-576.
Kant's Critique of Metaphysics.Damian Ilodigwe - 2015 - WAJOPS West African Journal of Philosophical Studies 17:130-154.
Problem syntetyczności sądów a priori w ujęciu Hermanna Lotzego.Wojciech Hanuszkiewicz - 2012 - Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal 2 (2):363-376.
The Synthetic a Priori in Kant and German Idealism.Seung-Kee Lee - 2009 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 91 (3):288-328.
The Third Thing in Synthetic Judgement a Priori in Kant's Philosophy.Reza Mahoozi - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 3 (214):89-104.
Metaphysical Motives of Kant's Analytic–Synthetic Distinction.Desmond Hogan - 2013 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 51 (2):267-307.
Kant's Theory of Definition.Lewis White Beck - 1956 - Philosophical Review 65 (2):179-191.
Kant's Theory of Definition.Lewis Beck - 2013 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 18:178-197.
Apriority in Kant and Merleau-Ponty.M. C. Dillon - 1987 - Kant-Studien 78 (1-4):403-423.


Added to PP index

Total views
86 ( #92,828 of 2,260,167 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
86 ( #6,280 of 2,260,167 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature