University of Chicago Press (1993)

Authors
Daniel Herwitz
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Abstract
Artists and critics regularly enlist theory in the creation and assessment of artworks, but few have scrutinized the art theories themselves. Here, Daniel examines and critiques the norms, assumptions, historical conditions, and institutions that have framed the development and uses of art theory. Spurred by the theoretical claims of Arthur Danto, a leader in the philosophy of the avant-garde, Herwitz reexamines the art and theory of major figures in the avant-garde movement including John Cage, Jean-François Lyotard, Jean Baudrillard, and Andy Warhol.
Keywords Art Philosophy  Constructivism (Philosophy  Avant-garde (Aesthetics History
Categories (categorize this paper)
Call number N71.H45 1993
ISBN(s) 0226328910   9780226328911  
DOI 10.2307/431553
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,676
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Art and Philosophy: Rivals or Partners?Negrin Llewellyn - 2005 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 31 (7):801-822.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
35 ( #285,826 of 2,386,398 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #554,109 of 2,386,398 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes