Making theory/constructing art: on the authority of the avant-garde

Chicago: University of Chicago Press (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Artists and critics regularly enlist theory in the creation and assessment of artworks, but few have scrutinized the art theories themselves. Here, Daniel examines and critiques the norms, assumptions, historical conditions, and institutions that have framed the development and uses of art theory. Spurred by the theoretical claims of Arthur Danto, a leader in the philosophy of the avant-garde, Herwitz reexamines the art and theory of major figures in the avant-garde movement including John Cage, Jean-François Lyotard, Jean Baudrillard, and Andy Warhol.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 84,292

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
36 (#351,304)

6 months
1 (#510,180)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Herwitz
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Citations of this work

Art and philosophy: Rivals or partners?Negrin Llewellyn - 2005 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 31 (7):801-822.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references