“please Don’t Tell Me” - The Right Not To Know

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (1):20-29 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Knowledge is generally a good thing. People who know lots of bits of information are generally admired. Some of them win prizes in TV competitions. If you were offered the gift of having an entire encyclopedia wired into your brain, you would probably accept, without thinking. But we should be wary of assuming that all knowledge is good. Too much knowledge can inhibit rather than enable thought

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epistemic value and achievement.Daniel Whiting - 2012 - Ratio 25 (2):216-230.
Fallibilism.Stephen Hetherington - 2005 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The nature of ability and the purpose of knowledge.John Greco - 2007 - Philosophical Issues 17 (1):57–69.
Back to Knowledge: The Ironic Path of Teaching Thinking.Yoram Harpaz - 2011 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 26 (3):39-46.
Person as Moral Scientist.Nicholas Humphrey - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4):340.
Desire and the Good in Plotinus.Michael Oliver Wiitala - 2013 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (4):649-666.
Success and Knowledge-How.Katherine Hawley - 2003 - American Philosophical Quarterly 40 (1):19 - 31.
Wissensaussage und die Unmöglichkeit ihrer Objektivierung.Ota Weinberger - 1975 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 1 (1):101-120.
Perfectionism and politics.Richard J. Arneson - 2000 - Ethics 111 (1):37-63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
15 (#923,100)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references