The interpretation of quantum mechanics has been a problem since its founding days. A large contribution to the discussion of possible interpretations of quantum mechanics is given by the so-called impossibility proofs for hidden variable models; models that allow a realist interpretation. In this thesis some of these proofs are discussed, like von Neumann’s Theorem, the Kochen-Specker Theorem and the Bell-inequalities. Some more recent developments are also investigated, like Meyer’s nullification of the Kochen-Specker Theorem, the MKC-models and Conway and Kochen’s Free Will Theorem. This last one is taken to suggest that the problems that arise for certain interpretations of quantum mechanics are not limited to realist interpretations only, but also affect certain instrumentalist interpretations. It is argued that one may arrive at a more satisfying interpretation of quantum mechanics if one adopts a logic that seems more compatible with the instrumentalist viewpoint namely, intuitionistic logic. The motivations for adopting this form of logic rather than classical logic or quantum logic are linked to some of the philosophical ideas of Bohr. In particular a new interpretation of Bohr’s notion of complementarity is proposed. Finally some possibilities are explored for linking the intuitionistic interpretation of quantum mechanics to the mathematical formalism of the theory.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Problem of Contextuality and the Impossibility of Experimental Metaphysics Thereof.Ronnie Hermens - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 42 (4):214-225.
The Hanneke Janssen Memorial Prize Paper 2010.J. Uffink - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 42 (4):213-.
The Problem of Contextuality and the Impossibility of Experimental Metaphysics Thereof.Ronnie Hermens - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 42 (4):214-225.
The Hanneke Janssen Memorial Prize Paper 2010.J. Uffink - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 42 (4):213.
Similar books and articles
Quantum Theory, Reconsideration of Foundations 4: Växjö (Sweden), 11-16 June, 2007.Guillaume Adenier (ed.) - 2007 - American Institute of Physics.
Niels Bohr's Generalization of Classical Mechanics.Peter Bokulich - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (3):347-371.
A Uniqueness Theorem for 'No Collapse' Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics.J. Bub & R. Clifton - 1996 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 27 (2):181-219.
Two No-Go Theorems for Modal Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics.E. P. - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 30 (3):403-431.
Kochen's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.Frank Arntzenius - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:241 - 249.
The Bohmian Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics : A Pitfall for Realism.A. Matzkin & V. Nvrock - unknown
Philosophen in der Mikrowelt — Ratlos?Manfred Stöckler - 1986 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 17 (1):68-95.
The Contextual Character of Modal Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics.Graciela Domenech, Hector Freytes & Christian de Ronde - unknown
Logical Foundations for Modal Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics.Michael Dickson - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):329.
A Philosopher's Understanding of Quantum Mechanics: Possibilities and Impossibilities of a Modal Interpretation.Pieter E. Vermaas - 1999 - Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-12-10
Total downloads99 ( #51,302 of 2,168,936 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,364 of 2,168,936 )
How can I increase my downloads?