The Logic of Turing Progressions

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 61 (1):155-180 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Turing progressions arise by iteratedly adding consistency statements to a base theory. Different notions of consistency give rise to different Turing progressions. In this paper we present a logic that generates exactly all relations that hold between these different Turing progressions given a particular set of natural consistency notions. Thus, the presented logic is proven to be arithmetically sound and complete for a natural interpretation, named the formalized Turing progressions interpretation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,748

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-20

Downloads
36 (#681,612)

6 months
8 (#482,871)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joost Joosten
Universitat de Barcelona

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Proof-theoretic analysis by iterated reflection.Lev D. Beklemishev - 2003 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 42 (6):515-552.
Provability algebras and proof-theoretic ordinals, I.Lev D. Beklemishev - 2004 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 128 (1-3):103-123.
Positive provability logic for uniform reflection principles.Lev Beklemishev - 2014 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 165 (1):82-105.
Iterated local reflection versus iterated consistency.Lev Beklemishev - 1995 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 75 (1-2):25-48.

View all 7 references / Add more references