Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (4):373-382 (2012)
The principle of proportionality is used in many different contexts. Some of these uses and contexts are first briefly indicated. This paper focusses on the use of this principle as a moral principle. I argue that under certain conditions the principle of proportionality is helpful as a guide in decision-making. But it needs to be clarified and to be used with some flexibility as a context-dependent principle. Several interpretations of the principle are distinguished, using three conditions as a starting point: importance of objective, relevance of means, and most favourable option. The principle is then tested against an example, which suggests that a fourth condition, focusing on non-excessiveness, needs to be added. I will distinguish between three main interpretations of the principle, some primarily with uses in research ethics, others with uses in other areas of bioethics, for instance in comparisons of therapeutic means and ends. The relations between the principle of proportionality and the precautionary principle are explored in the following section. It is concluded that the principles are different and may even clash. In the next section the principle of proportionality is applied to some medical examples drawn from research ethics and bioethics. In concluding, the status of the principle of proportionality as a moral principle is discussed. What has been achieved so far and what remains to be done is finally summarized
|Keywords||Appropriateness Excessiveness Means and ends Precautionary principle Principle of proportionality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies.Bruno Latour - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
The Nature of Suffering and the Goals of Medicine.Eric J. Cassell - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.Max Weber, Talcott Parsons & R. H. Tawney - 1930 - Charles Scribnerr's Sons.
An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation.Jeremy Bentham - 1780 - Dover Publications.
Citations of this work BETA
Regions, Concepts and Integrations.Henk ten Have & Bert Gordijn - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (4):363-364.
Ethical Tensions in the Pain Management of an End-Stage Cancer Patient with Evidence of Opioid Medication Diversion.Arvind Venkat & David Kim - 2016 - HEC Forum 28 (2):95-101.
Similar books and articles
Explaining the Principle of Mala in Se.Morten Dige - 2012 - Journal of Military Ethics 11 (4):318-332.
Proportionality, Just War Theory and Weapons Innovation.John Forge - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):25-38.
Embryos, The Principle of Proportionality, and the Shaky Ground of Moral Respect.Jonathan Pugh - 2014 - Bioethics 28 (8):420-426.
Formulating the Precautionary Principle.Neil A. Manson - 2002 - Environmental Ethics 24 (3):263-274.
Is the Precautionary Principle Unscientific?B. D. - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 34 (2):329-344.
Is the Principle of Proportionality Sufficient to Guide Physicians' Decisions Regarding Withholding/Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment After Suicide Attempts?Stanley A. Terman - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (3):22 - 24.
Military Ethics of Fighting Terror: An Israeli Perspective†.Asa Kasher & Amos Yadlin - 2005 - Journal of Military Ethics 4 (1):3-32.
Ordinal Proportionality in Punishment: A Case Against Capital Punishment for Child Rape Under the Eighth Amendment.Issa Kohler-Hausmann - manuscript
Proportionality in Decentralised Action: The Dutch Court Experience in Free Movement of Services and Freedom of Establishment Cases.Herman van Harten - unknown
Resituating the Principle of Equipoise: Justice and Access to Care in Non-Ideal Conditions.Rebecca Kukla - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (3):171-202.
How Not to Criticize the Precautionary Principle.Jonathan Hughes - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (5):447 – 464.
Is Hume's Principle Analytic?Crispin Wright - 2001 - In Bob Hale & Crispin Wright (eds.), Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. Oxford University Press. pp. 307-333.
On the Axiomatics of Resource Allocation: Interpreting the Consistency Principle.William Thomson - 2012 - Economics and Philosophy 28 (3):385-421.
Added to index2011-11-03
Total downloads24 ( #210,498 of 2,168,195 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,757 of 2,168,195 )
How can I increase my downloads?