Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 40 (5):403-418 (2019)

Authors
David B. Hershenov
State University of New York, Buffalo
Abstract
Psychological accounts of personal identity claim that the human person is not identical to the human animal. Advocates of such accounts maintain that the definition and criterion of death for a human person should differ from the definition and criterion of death for a human animal. My contention is instead that psychological accounts of personal identity should have human persons dying deaths that are defined biologically, just like the deaths of human animals. Moreover, if brain death is the correct criterion for the death of a human animal, then it is also the correct criterion for the death of a human person. What the nonidentity of persons and animals requires is only that they have distinct criteria for ceasing to exist.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11017-019-09506-8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,021
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

We Are Not Human Beings.Derek Parfit - 2012 - Philosophy 87 (1):5-28.
What Are We?Eric T. Olson - 2007 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (5-6):37-55.
Problems of the Self: Philosophical Papers, 1956-1972.John Perry - 1976 - Journal of Philosophy 73 (13):416-428.

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Brain death: new questions and fresh perspectives.Farr Curlin - 2019 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 40 (5):355-358.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Separating Death From Mind and Morals.Michael Lavin - 1989 - Public Affairs Quarterly 3 (3):35-47.
Analytic Philosophy And Death: Brain Death And Personal Identity.Maurizio Salvi - 1996 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 6 (5):123-124.
The Whole-Brain Concept of Death Remains Optimum Public Policy.James L. Bernat - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (1):35-43.
Brain Death and Personal Existence: A Reply to Green and Wikler.Howard Brody - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (2):187-196.
Is Brain Death Death?Lukas J. Meier - 2016 - Dissertation, University of Oxford
Re-Examining Death: Against a Higher Brain Criterion.Josie Fisher - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (6):473-476.
John Locke on Personal Identity.N. Nimbalkar - 2011 - Mens Sana Monographs 9 (1):268.
A Defense of Brain Death.Nada Gligorov - 2016 - Neuroethics 9 (2):119-127.
The Conservative Use of the Brain-Death Criterion – a Critique.Tom Tomlinson - 1984 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (4):377-394.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-11-19

Total views
12 ( #769,560 of 2,433,467 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #217,362 of 2,433,467 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes