Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (2):551-583 (2018)
AbstractPromoting the ethical formation of engineering students through the cultivation of their discipline-specific knowledge, sensitivity, imagination, and reasoning skills has become a goal for many engineering education programs throughout the United States. However, there is neither a consensus throughout the engineering education community regarding which strategies are most effective towards which ends, nor which ends are most important. This study provides an overview of engineering ethics interventions within the U.S. through the systematic analysis of articles that featured ethical interventions in engineering, published in select peer-reviewed journals, and published between 2000 and 2015. As a core criterion, each journal article reviewed must have provided an overview of the course as well as how the authors evaluated course-learning goals. In sum, 26 articles were analyzed with a coding scheme that included 56 binary items. The results indicate that the most common methods for integrating ethics into engineering involved exposing students to codes/standards, utilizing case studies, and discussion activities. Nearly half of the articles had students engage with ethical heuristics or philosophical ethics. Following the presentation of the results, this study describes in detail four articles to highlight less common but intriguing pedagogical methods and evaluation techniques. The findings indicate that there is limited empirical work on ethics education within engineering across the United States. Furthermore, due to the large variation in goals, approaches, and evaluation methods described across interventions, this study does not detail “best” practices for integrating ethics into engineering. The science and engineering education community should continue exploring the relative merits of different approaches to ethics education in engineering.
Similar books and articles
Ethical Risk Management Education in Engineering: A Systematic Review.Yoann Guntzburger, Thierry C. Pauchant & Philippe A. Tanguy - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (2):323-350.
A Systematic Approach to Engineering Ethics Education.Jessica Li & Shengli Fu - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):339-349.
“Mind the Gaps”: An Empirical Approach to Engineering Ethics, 1997–2001. [REVIEW]Robert E. McGinn - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4):517-542.
Reflexive Principlism as an Effective Approach for Developing Ethical Reasoning in Engineering.Jonathan Beever & Andrew O. Brightman - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (1):275-291.
A Psychological Model That Integrates Ethics in Engineering Education.Susan Magun-Jackson - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (2):219-224.
Topics and Cases for Online Education in Engineering.Jimmy H. Smith - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):451-458.
Comparison of China-US Engineering Ethics Educations in Sino-Western Philosophies of Technology.Gui Hong Cao - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (6):1609-1635.
Taking Emotion Seriously: Meeting Students Where They Are. [REVIEW]Mary E. Sunderland - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics (1):1-13.
Using the Chernobyl Incident to Teach Engineering Ethics.William R. Wilson - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):625-640.
Socio-Ethical Education in Nanotechnology Engineering Programmes: A Case Study in Malaysia. [REVIEW]Balamuralithara Balakrishnan, Pek Hoon Er & Punita Visvanathan - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):1341-1355.
Broadening Engineering Education: Bringing the Community In: Commentary on “Social Responsibility in French Engineering Education: A Historical and Sociological Analysis”.Eddie Conlon - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (4):1589-1594.
Ethics Education in the Consulting Engineering Environment: Where Do We Start?Keith E. Elder - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (2):325-336.
Yoga and the Battlefield of Ethics: Highlighting an Infusion Model for Ethics Education.Stephen Kaplan - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (2):391-398.
The Dilemma of Ethics in Engineering Education.ron Newberry - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (2):343-351.
Comparison of Cross Culture Engineering Ethics Training Using the Simulator for Engineering Ethics Education.Christopher Chung - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (2):471-478.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Boeing 737 MAX: Lessons for Engineering Ethics.Joseph Herkert, Jason Borenstein & Keith Miller - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (6):2957-2974.
The Development of a Case-Based Course on Global Engineering Ethics in China.Rockwell F. Clancy - 2020 - International Journal of Ethics Education 6 (1):51-73.
The Moral Consideration of Artificial Entities: A Literature Review.Jamie Harris & Jacy Reese Anthis - 2021 - Science and Engineering Ethics 27 (4):1-95.
Conceptualizing a Theory of Ethical Behavior in Engineering.Luan Minh Nguyen, Cristina Poleacovschi, Kasey M. Faust, Kate Padgett-Walsh, Scott G. Feinstein & Cassandra J. Rutherford - unknown
The Ethical Education and Perspectives of Chinese Engineering Students: A Preliminary Investigation and Recommendations.Rockwell F. Clancy - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (4):1935-1965.
References found in this work
In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development.Carol Gilligan - 1982 - Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development.Carol Gilligan - 1982 - The Personalist Forum 2 (2):150-152.
The Good Engineer: Giving Virtue its Due in Engineering Ethics.Charles E. Harris - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (2):153-164.
Ordinary Ethics: Anthropology, Language, and Action.Michael Lambek (ed.) - 2010 - Fordham University Press.
Ways of Thinking About and Teaching Ethical Problem Solving: Microethics and Macroethics in Engineering. [REVIEW]Joseph R. Herkert - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):373-385.