Coordination in the Science System: Theoretical Framework and a Case Study of an Intermediary Organization [Book Review]
Minerva 51 (3):317-339 (2013)
AbstractMany science systems are witnessing the rise of intermediary organizations with a coordinating mission, but to date a systematic understanding of their function and effects is lacking. The aim of this paper is to contribute to the understanding of the coordinating efforts of intermediary organizations. Starting from the definition of coordination as the establishment or strengthening of a relationship among the activities in a system, with the aim to enhance their common effectiveness, I develop a heuristic framework that facilitates the systematic analysis of coordination in science. I illustrate and substantiate my framework with the empirical case study of a Dutch coordination task force in the area of chemical technologies. Thanks to the framework I could disentangle a number of functions that this task force fulfils concerning research programming, funding allocation and supporting interactions and collaborations. This approach enabled me to systematically analyse a very heterogeneous set of processes that each deserve to be called coordination. The analysis yields a clear overview of eight coordination processes that are each described in terms of activities, intervention, relationships, mechanisms and performance. I conclude my paper with suggestions for further research on coordination in the science system
Similar books and articles
What framework of rules is required to deliver economic policy coordination within the economic and monetary union?Thomas Ponchie - manuscript
Strategic coordination and the law.Nicholas Almendares & Dimitri Landa - 2007 - Law and Philosophy 26 (5):501-529.
Networked coordination: Effect of network structure human subjects' ability to solve coordination problem.Ramamohan Paturi, Mathew D. McCubbins & Nicholas Weller - unknown
Experimental evidence of the emergence of aesthetic rules in pure coordination games.Federica Alberti - manuscript
Convergence of biological and psychological perspectives on cognitive coordination in schizophrenia.William A. Phillips & Steven M. Silverstein - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):65-82.
Coordination and cooperation.Maarten C. W. Janssen - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):165-166.
Self-Organization and Self-Governance.J. T. Ismael - 2011 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (3):327-351.
A wide-spectrum coordination model of schizophrenia.Hendrik Pieter Barendregt - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):84-85.
Peeling the onion: NMDA dysfunction as a unifying model in schizophrenia.Daniel C. Javitt - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):93-94.
A Neurathian Conception of the Unity of Science.Angela Potochnik - 2011 - Erkenntnis 74 (3):305-319.
The Unconventional, but Conventionalist, Legacy of Lewis’s “Convention”.Olivier Favereau - 2008 - Topoi 27 (1-2):115-126.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge.Karin Knorr-Cetina - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences.Richard Whitley - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory. [REVIEW]Michael Polanyi - 2000 - Minerva 38 (1):1-21.
Search Regimes and the Industrial Dynamics of Science.Andrea Bonaccorsi - 2008 - Minerva 46 (3):285-315.