"Dead donor" versus "respect for donor" rule: Putting the cart before the horse

American Journal of Bioethics 3 (1):24 – 26 (2003)
Abstract
This Article does not have an abstract
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1162/152651603321611881
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,520
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Dead Donor Rule: Not Dead Yet.Laura A. Siminoff - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (1):30.
Abandon the Dead Donor Rule or Change the Definition of Death?Robert M. Veatch - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (3):261-276.
Does the Respect for Donor Rule Respect the Donor?Denise M. Dudzinski - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (1):23 – 24.
Reconsidering the Dead Donor Rule: Is It Important That Organ Donors Be Dead?Norman Fost - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (3):249-260.
Reevaluating the Dead Donor Rule.Mike Collins - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):1-26.
Respect for Donor Autonomy and the Dead Donor Rule.Wayne Shelton - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (1):20 – 21.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
13 ( #359,824 of 2,180,777 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #300,627 of 2,180,777 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums