Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (5-6):423-437 (2004)
AbstractThe term community in ethics and bioethics traditionally has been used to designate either a specific kind of moral relationship available to rational agents or, in contrast, the context in which any sense of rational agency can even be understood. I argue that bioethics is better served when both selves and community are expressed through a more processive language that highlights the functional character of such concepts. In particular, I see the turn to processive community in bioethics as a turn towards method, contextualization, and narrative. In clinical practice, such a processive account demands that bioethics concentrate on methods of developing healthy dialogue and deeper understanding from within the problematic situation rather than trying to fix problems using ethical tools developed from outside the present situation. Community, I argue, is in and of the interactive processes of inquiry itself. Such inquiry, such communitying, requires that we engage individual patients in context; it demands more than simply gaining their permission or mere consent; it demands developing a supportive environment for participation.
Similar books and articles
Social-science perspectives on bioethics: Predictive genetic testing (PGT) in asia. [REVIEW]Margaret Sleeboom-Faulkner - 2007 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):197-206.
An Attempt to Shut Down Discourse About a Controversial Practice Will Not Benefit Patients, Human Subjects, the Bioethics Community, or the Research Community.Anne Tamar-Mattis - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):64-66.
Working with Concepts: The Role of Community in International Collaborative Biomedical Research.V. M. Marsh, D. K. Kamuya, M. J. Parker & C. S. Molyneux - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (1):26-39.
Community and Progress in Kant's Moral Philosophy.Kate A. Moran - 2012 - Catholic University of America Press.
Confronting Condescending Ethics: How Community-Based Research Challenges Traditional Approaches to Consent, Confidentiality, and Capacity. [REVIEW]Colleen Reid & Elana Brief - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):75-85.
Rethinking Community in the Global Age.Elena Pulcini - 2010 - Iris. European Journal of Philosophy and Public Debate 2 (3):87-101.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Seeking consent to genetic and genomic research in a rural Ghanaian setting: A qualitative study of the MalariaGEN experience. [REVIEW]Paulina Tindana, Susan Bull, Lucas Amenga-Etego, Jantina de Vries, Raymond Aborigo, Kwadwo Koram, Dominic Kwiatkowski & Michael Parker - 2012 - BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):15-.
Ethics in practice: the state of the debate on promoting the social value of global health research in resource poor settings particularly Africa.Geoffrey M. Lairumbi, Michael Parker, Raymond Fitzpatrick & Michael C. English - 2011 - BMC Medical Ethics 12 (1):22.
Mind the gaps: Intersex and (re-productive) spaces in disability studies and bioethics.M. Morgan Holmes - 2008 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (2-3):169-181.
References found in this work
Some Consequences of Four Incapacities.Charles S. Peirce - 2011 - In Robert B. Talisse & Scott F. Aikin (eds.), The Pragmatism Reader: From Peirce Through the Present. Princeton University Press. pp. 12-36.
Narrative as Bioethics: The ???Fact??? of Social Selves and the Function of Consensus.D. Micah Hester - 2002 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (1):17-26.
Community as Healing: Pragmatist Ethics in Medical Encounters.D. Micah Hester - 2002 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 38 (3):473-476.