Epistemology's Paradox: Is a Theory of Knowledge Possible?

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (4):976-979 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epistemology futures.Stephen Cade Hetherington (ed.) - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Comments on Moore's paradox and self-knowledge.Rogers Albritton - 1995 - Philosophical Studies 77 (2-3):229-239.
Moore’s paradox and self-knowledge.Sydney Shoemaker - 1995 - Philosophical Studies 77 (2-3):211-28.
Epistemic Logic and Epistemology.Boudewijn de Bruin - 2007 - In Vincent F. Hendricks & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), New Waves in Epistemology. Palgrave-Macmillan.
The theory of knowledge: a thematic introduction.Paul K. Moser (ed.) - 1998 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Epistemic Logic and Epistemology.Wesley H. Holliday - 2018 - In Sven Ove Hansson Vincent F. Hendricks (ed.), Handbook of Formal Philosophy. Springer. pp. 351-369.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
24 (#639,942)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Hetherington
University of New South Wales

Citations of this work

Idealist Origins: 1920s and Before.Martin Davies & Stein Helgeby - 2014 - In Graham Oppy & Nick Trakakis (eds.), History of Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. pp. 15-54.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references