Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge: On Two Dogmas of Epistemology

Oxford University Press (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is knowledge? How hard is it for a person to have knowledge? Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge confronts contemporary philosophical attempts to answer those classic questions, offering a theory of knowledge that is unique in conceiving of knowledge in a non-absolutist way.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Chapters

Knowing about knowledge

Epistemologists usually talk of their theories of knowledge as articulating their understanding of knowledge. Do they thereby take themselves to have knowledge of knowledge? Is a true theory of knowledge a piece of knowledge about knowledge? It should be. But how likely are epistemological... see more

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
156 (#82,247)

6 months
6 (#132,512)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Hetherington
University of New South Wales

Citations of this work

Know-How and Gradability.Carlotta Pavese - 2017 - Philosophical Review 126 (3):345-383.
Competence to know.Lisa Miracchi - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (1):29-56.
Reliabilism and the Value of Knowledge.Alvin I. Goldman & Erik J. Olsson - 2009 - In Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), Epistemic Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 19--41.
Safety and Necessity.Niall J. Paterson - 2022 - Erkenntnis 87 (3):1081-1097.

View all 61 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references