Valuing predation in Rolston's environmental ethics: Bambi lovers versus tree huggers

Environmental Ethics 16 (1):3-20 (1994)
Abstract
Without modification, Rolston’s environmental ethics is biased in favor of plants, since he gives them stronger protection than animals. Rolston can avoid this bias by extending his principle protecting plants (the principle of the nonloss of goods) to human interactions with animals. Were he to do so, however, he would risk undermining his acceptance of meat eating and certain types of hunting. I argue,nevertheless, that meat eating and hunting, properly conceived, are compatible with this extended ethics. As the quintessential natural process, carnivorous predation is rightfully valued and respected by such environmentalists as Rolston. Because the condemnation of human participation in predation by animal activists suggests a hatred of nature, the challenge for Rolston’s animal activist critics is to show that one can properly appreciate natural predation while consistently and plausibly objecting to human participation in it
Keywords Applied Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0163-4275
DOI 10.5840/enviroethics199416138
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,334
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Can Nature Be Evil?: Rolston, Disvalue, and Theodicy.Wayne Ouderkirk - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (2):135-150.
Rolston's Theological Ethic.Francisco Benzoni - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (4):339-352.
Ferré: Organicistic Connectedness—But Still Speciesistic.Arthur Zucker - 1996 - Ethics and the Environment 1 (2):185 - 190.
An Environmentalist's Lament on Predation.Ty Raterman - 2008 - Environmental Ethics 30 (4):417-434.
Animal Beauty, Ethics, and Environmental Preservation.Ned Hettinger - 2010 - Environmental Ethics 32 (2):115-134.
Against Rolston's Defense of Eating Animals.John Mizzoni - 2002 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (1):125-131.
Hunting ≠ Predation.Paul Veatch Moriarty & Mark Woods - 1997 - Environmental Ethics 19 (4):391-404.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
24 ( #236,415 of 2,224,478 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #248,925 of 2,224,478 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature