Consensus and power in deliberative democracy

How does public discussion contribute to the reasonableness with which power is exercised in a democracy? Contemporary answers to this question (such as formulated by Rawls or Habermas), are often based upon two interconnected preconceptions. These are, 1. the idea that the value of public discussion lies primarily in the fact that citizens can reach a reasonable consensus through argumentation and discussion and, 2. the belief that the exercise of power is legitimate only if it is determined by a reasonable consensus among citizens. In this sense, 'reasonable consensus among citizens' eliminates, under ideal conditions, the 'autonomy' of the exercise of power. However, these ideals of democracy appear to conflict with certain aspects of democratic society; aspects, moreover, which we tend to value quite highly. I therefore advance an alternative account of the reasonableness of power in democratic societies; one which acknowledges both the characteristically unlimited scope of public discussion in democratic society and the fact that such discussion rarely or perhaps even never ends in a general consensus. In order to elucidate the democratic character of society we must explain the relationship between discussion and power in such a way that we understand both the need for discussion and the necessity of an autonomous exercise of power.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201740600725723
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,511
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth.Richard Rorty - 1991 - Cambridge University Press.
Collected Papers.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Philosophical Arguments.Charles Taylor - 1995 - Harvard University Press.

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Power, Norms and Theory. A Meta-Political Inquiry.Heysse Tim - 2017 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (2):163-185.
Power, Norms and Theory. A Meta-Political Inquiry.Tim Heysse - 2015 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-23.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
49 ( #108,625 of 2,180,714 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #301,383 of 2,180,714 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums