Experimenting with embryos: Can philosophy help?

Bioethics 10 (4):292–309 (1996)
Abstract
Beyond the well‐known ethical issues involved in medical experimentation on human subjects, experimenting with embryos raises unique and particularly hard problems. Beside the psychological obstacles connected with the fear of ‘‘playing God" and the awe with which we hold the process of the creation of human beings, there are three philosophical problems which are the main subject of the article:1. The logical problem of circularity: the morality of experimenting on embryos is dependent on the status of the embryo, which in turn is partly decided by experimentation.2. The metaphysical problem: experiments are justified by the benefits they bring to human subjects; but it is doubtful whether an early embryo is a ‘‘subject" and whether coming into being is a ‘‘benefit".3. The moral problem: the standard constraint on medical experiments is that they benefit either the individual subject or at least members of a relevantly defined group of patients suffering from the same syndrome. But embryo experimentation is often associated with potential cure to people of a completely different category .Finally, the article discusses the limits of the force of philosophical arguments in the formation of actual policies for regulating such practices as experimenting with embryos. The widely‐shared fourteen‐day limit is shown to be a sound practical compromise despite the difficulties in justifying it philosophically
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1996.tb00130.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,898
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Arguing From Potential.Stephen Buckle - 1988 - Bioethics 2 (3):227–253.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Philosophy and Other Disciplines.Sven Ove Hansson - 2008 - Metaphilosophy 39 (4-5):472-483.
Moral and Instrumental Norms in Food Risk Communication.Peter G. Modin & Sven Ove Hansson - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 101 (2):313 - 324.
Applying Philosophy.Sven Ove Hansson - 2003 - Theoria 69 (1-2):1-3.
Philosophy as Mere Rhetoric?Sven Ove Hansson - 2008 - Theoria 74 (4):267-270.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Saving Seven Embryos or Saving One Child? Michael Sandel on the Moral Status of Human Embryos.Gregor Damschen & Dieter Schönecker - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Ethics and the Life Sciences):239-245.
Resolving Disputes Over Frozen Embryos: A New Proposal.Jeremy Williams - 2010 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (2):172-185.
Does Respect for Embryos Entail Respect for Gametes?Alfonso Gómez-Lobo - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (3):199-208.
Thought Experimenting as Mental Modeling.Nancy J. Nersessian - 2007 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 7 (2):125-161.
The Ethics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research.Howard J. Curzer - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (5):533 – 562.
The Embryo Rescue Case.S. Matthew Liao - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (2):141-147.
Experimenting on and Experimenting With: Polywater and Experimental Realism.William J. Mckinney - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (3):295-307.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
12 ( #468,677 of 2,293,857 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #410,247 of 2,293,857 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature