The Unreality Business - How Economics (and Management) Became Anti-philosophical

Philosophy of Management 14 (1):47-66 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper argues that economics, over the past 200 years, has become steadily more anti-philosophical and that there are three stages in the development of economic thought. Adam Smith intended economics to be a descriptive social science, rooted in an understanding of the moral and psychological processes of an individual’s decision-making and its connection to society in general. Yet, immediately after Smith’s death, economists made a clean cut and invented a totally new discipline: they switched towards a physicalist understanding of human nature. Humans, like atoms, follow a natural law: they are driven by an emotion (defined as a non-emotion, rationality), namely selfishness. Thus economics became a ‘natural’ science. In the 20th century, the second reinterpretation removed all traces of humanity from the study of economics and declared economics to be a formal science like mathematics and logics. The actor in Phase 3 economics is homo economicus syntheticus, a postulate whose only connection to real humanity is the word homo. The paper asks what the results of this dramatic relocation are and why Phase 3 economics still claims descent from Smithian economics, despite the massive differences.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Seven management moralities.Thomas Klikauer - 2012 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
The genesis and ethos of the market.Luigino Bruni - 2012 - New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan. Edited by Luigino Bruni.
Around europe: A spanish colloquium on ethical business.Antonio Argandoña - 1993 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 2 (3):160–163.
On the ethics behind “business ethics”.Dag G. Aasland - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):3-8.


Added to PP

32 (#503,204)

6 months
6 (#530,615)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Ethics and the limits of philosophy.Bernard Williams - 1985 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
After Virtue.A. MacIntyre - 1981 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 46 (1):169-171.
Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy.Bernard Williams - 1986 - Cambridge, Mass.: Routledge.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.

View all 72 references / Add more references