Politics and Ethics Review 3 (2):200-216 (2007)

Abstract
A prominent feature of the ongoing politics of welfare state restructuring is the development of workfare policies, defined as the attachment of a work condition to entitlement to basic income support. Workfare rejects unconditional rights of social citizenship, which formed the basis of social democratic political reforms and advocacy throughout the twentieth century. Nevertheless, workfare has received notable theoretical justification from egalitarian political theorists. This paper addresses four egalitarian arguments for workfare: the arguments from recipient self-respect, rational paternalism, fair reciprocity, and equal opportunity for active citizenship. It attempts to demonstrate the tensions between each and egalitarian justification, and it is argued that none of the arguments successfully ground workfare policies in an egalitarian framework
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3366/per.2007.3.2.200
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,342
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Fairness, Respect, and the Egalitarian Ethos.Jonathan Wolff - 1998 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (2):97-122.
Incentives, Inequality, and Publicity.Andrew Williams - 1998 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (3):225-247.
The Benefits of Cooperation.Joseph Heath - 2006 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 34 (4):313-351.
Justice as Reciprocity Versus Subject-Centered Justice.Allen Buchanan - 1990 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 19 (3):227-252.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

What Is Wrong with Conditional Cash Transfer Programs?Cristian Pérez-Muñoz - 2017 - Journal of Social Philosophy 48 (4):440-460.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Backing Away From Equality.Steven Wall - 2012 - Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (2):96-105.
A Liberal Egalitarian Paradox.Alexander W. Cappelen & Bertil Tungodden - 2006 - Economics and Philosophy 22 (3):393-408.
What's Wrong with Workfare? StuartWhite - 2004 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (3):271–284.
What's Wrong with Workfare?Stuart White - 2004 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (3):271-284.
I possibili ruoli del workfare.Elena Granaglia - 2000 - Filosofia Oggi 5 (2):65.
Liberalism, Perfectionism and Workfare.Christoph Henning - 2009 - Analyse & Kritik 31 (1):159-180.
Workfare: The Fourth Pillar of Social Security in Singapore.J. Poh - 2007 - Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 3.
Workfare and the Imposition of Discipline.Mary E. Hawkesworth - 1985 - Social Theory and Practice 11 (2):163-181.
The Value of Equality.Bertil Tungodden - 2003 - Economics and Philosophy 19 (1):1-44.
Was Marx an Egalitarian? Skeptical Remarks on Miller's Marx in Egalitarian Ethics.Kai Nielsen - 1989 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 43 (170):438-450.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-02-02

Total views
38 ( #248,563 of 2,326,062 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #165,413 of 2,326,062 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes