LIS and BCIs: a Local, Pluralist, and Pragmatist Approach to 4E Cognition

Neuroethics 9 (2):187-198 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Four previous papers in this journal have discussed the role of Brain-Computer Interfaces in the lives of Locked-In Syndrome patients in terms of the four “E” frameworks for cognition – extended, embedded, embodied, and enactive cognition. This paper argues that in the light of more recent literature on these 4E frameworks, none of the four papers has taken quite the right approach to deciding which, if any, of the E frameworks is the best one for the job. More specifically, I argue for an approach that is pragmatist rather than purely metaphysical, pluralist rather than monist, and perhaps most importantly, local to particular research programmes, rather than about BCIs in general. The paper will outline this approach, then illustrate it with reference to a particular research programme which tackles the issue of BCI communication for patients in Complete Locked-In Syndrome.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Locked-in syndrome: a challenge for embodied cognitive science.Miriam Kyselo & Ezequiel Di Paolo - 2015 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14 (3):517-542.
Cognition and behavior.Ken Aizawa - 2017 - Synthese 194 (11):4269-4288.
Distributed Cognition in Scientific Contexts.Hyundeuk Cheon - 2014 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 45 (1):23-33.
Social origins of cognition: Bartlett, evolutionary perspective and embodied mind approach.Akiko Saito - 1996 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 26 (4):399–421.


Added to PP

38 (#422,457)

6 months
3 (#984,214)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile